Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21865429›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Diagnostic strategy used to establish etiologies of encephalitis in a prospective cohort of patients in England.

H E Ambrose, J Granerod, J P Clewley, N W S Davies, G Keir, R Cunningham, M Zuckerman, K J Mutton, K N Ward, S Ijaz and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Herpesvirus-Associated Encephalitis: an Update.Current tropical medicine reports · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. DifferentialmBio · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Infection and Propagation of Astrovirus VA1 in Cell Culture.Current protocols in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Epidemiological Profile of Acute Viral Encephalitis in a Sample of Egyptian Children.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnostics of autoimmune encephalitis associated with antibodies against neuronal surface antigens.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H E AmbroseVirus Reference Department, Health Protection Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, United Kingdom.
J Granerod
J P Clewley
N W S Davies
G Keir
R Cunningham
M Zuckerman
K J Mutton
K N Ward
S Ijaz
N S Crowcroft
D W G Brown
UK Aetiology of Encephalitis Study Group
Manchester Royal Infirmary · GBPlymouth Hospital · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0108-10048Medical Research Council G116/194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laboratory diagnostic strategy used to determine the etiology of encephalitis in 203 patients is reported. An etiological diagnosis was made by first-line laboratory testing for 111 (55%) patients. Subsequent testing, based on individual case reviews, resulted in 17 (8%) further diagnoses, of which 12 (71%) were immune-mediated and 5 (29%) were due to infection. Seventy-five cases were of unknown etiology. Sixteen (8%) of 203 samples were found to be associated with either N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor or voltage-gated potassium channel complex antibodies. The most common viral causes identified were herpes simplex virus (HSV) (19%) and varicella-zoster virus (5%), while the most important bacterial cause was Mycobacterium tuberculosis (5%). The diagnostic value of testing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for antibody was assessed using 139 samples from 99 patients, and antibody was detected in 46 samples from 37 patients. Samples collected at 14 to 28 days were more likely to be positive than samples taken 0 to 6 days postadmission. Three PCR-negative HSV cases were diagnosed by the presence of virus-specific antibody in the central nervous system (CNS). It was not possible to make an etiological diagnosis for one-third of the cases; these were therefore considered to be due to unknown causes. Delayed sampling did not contribute to these cases. Twenty percent of the patients with infections with an unknown etiology showed evidence of localized immune activation within the CNS, but no novel viral DNA or RNA sequences were found. We conclude that a good standard of clinical investigation and thorough first-line laboratory testing allows the diagnosis of most cases of infectious encephalitis; testing for CSF antibodies allows further cases to be diagnosed. It is important that testing for immune-mediated causes also be included in a diagnostic algorithm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentAdultAntibodiesBacterial InfectionsCerebrospinal FluidChildChild, PreschoolClinical Laboratory TechniquesCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialEncephalitisEnglandFemaleHumansImmune System DiseasesAntibodies

Identifiers

PMID21865429
PMCPMC3187347
OpenAlexW2114508626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.