Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21864626›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2011

Broad and potent immune responses to a low dose intradermal HIV-1 DNA boosted with HIV-1 recombinant MVA among healthy adults in Tanzania.

Muhammad Bakari, Said Aboud, Charlotta Nilsson, Joel Francis, Deus Buma, Candida Moshiro, Eric A Aris, Eligius F Lyamuya, Mohamed Janabi, Karina Godoy-Ramirez and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad BakariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. drbakari@yahoo.com
Said Aboud
Charlotta Nilsson
Joel Francis
Deus Buma
Candida Moshiro
Eric A Aris
Eligius F Lyamuya
Mohamed Janabi
Karina Godoy-Ramirez
Agricola Joachim
Victoria R Polonis
Andreas Bråve
Patricia Earl
Merlin Robb
Mary Marovich
Britta Wahren
Kisali Pallangyo
Gunnel Biberfeld
Fred Mhalu
Eric Sandström
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZKarolinska Institutet · SEMuhimbili National Hospital · TZSwedish Institute · SEWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USNational Institute for Medical Research · TZNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Recombinant Virus VaccinesZIAAI000416 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI MOSS, BERNARD · 2009 to 2025
$17.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI000416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a phase I/II randomized placebo-controlled trial with the aim of exploring whether priming with a low intradermal dose of a multiclade, multigene HIV-1 DNA vaccine could improve the immunogenicity of the same vaccine given intramuscularly prior to boosting with a heterologous HIV-1 MVA among healthy adults in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

methodsSixty HIV-uninfected volunteers were randomized to receive DNA plasmid vaccine 1mg intradermally (id), n=20, or 3.8mg intramuscularly (im), n=20, or placebo, n=20, using a needle-free injection device. DNA plasmids encoding HIV-1 genes gp160 subtype A, B, C; rev B; p17/p24 gag A, B and Rtmut B were given at weeks 0, 4 and 12. Recombinant MVA (10(8)pfu) expressing HIV-1 Env, Gag, Pol of CRF01_AE or placebo was administered im at month 9 and 21.

resultsThe vaccines were well tolerated. Two weeks after the third HIV-DNA injection, 22/38 (58%) vaccinees had IFN-γ ELISpot responses to Gag. Two weeks after the first HIV-MVA boost all 35 (100%) vaccinees responded to Gag and 31 (89%) to Env. Two to four weeks after the second HIV-MVA boost, 28/29 (97%) vaccinees had IFN-γ ELISpot responses, 27 (93%) to Gag and 23 (79%) to Env. The id-primed recipients had significantly higher responses to Env than im recipients. Intracellular cytokine staining for Gag-specific IFN-γ/IL-2 production showed both CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell responses. All vaccinees had HIV-specific lymphoproliferative responses. All vaccinees reacted in diagnostic HIV serological tests and 26/29 (90%) had antibodies against gp160 after the second HIV-MVA boost. Furthermore, while all of 29 vaccinee sera were negative for neutralizing antibodies against clade B, C and CRF01_AE pseudoviruses in the TZM-bl neutralization assay, in a PBMC assay, the response rate ranged from 31% to 83% positives, depending upon the clade B or CRF01_AE virus tested.

conclusionsThis vaccine approach is safe and highly immunogenic. Low dose, id HIV-DNA priming elicited higher and broader cell-mediated immune responses to Env after HIV-MVA boost compared to a higher HIV-DNA priming dose given im. Three HIV-DNA priming immunizations followed by two HIV-MVA boosts efficiently induced Env-antibody responses.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdolescentAdultAIDS VaccinesCell ProliferationDrug CarriersEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayFemaleGenetic VectorsHIV-1Human ExperimentationHumansImmunization, SecondaryInjections, IntradermalInterferon-gammaLeukocytes, MononuclearAIDS VaccinesDrug CarriersInterferon-gammaPlacebosVaccines, DNAVaccines, SyntheticViral ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21864626
PMCPMC4795940
OpenAlexW2014694744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.