Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21864449›Full record

ArticleVisual neuroscience2011

Genetic targeting and physiological features of VGLUT3+ amacrine cells.

William N Grimes, Rebecca P Seal, Nicholas Oesch, Robert H Edwards, Jeffrey S Diamond

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

William N GrimesSynaptic Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-3701, USA.
Rebecca P Seal
Nicholas Oesch
Robert H Edwards
Jeffrey S Diamond
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Synaptic Mechanisms in the Mammalian RetinaZIANS003039 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI DIAMOND, JEFFREY S · 2009 to 2025
$24.5M
The Presynaptic Vesicle Cycle for the Slow Acting Neurotransmitter SecretionP01DA010154 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EDWARDS, ROBERT H, KREITZER, ANATOL · 1995 to 2016
$14.7M
TRANSPORT OF NEUROTRANSMITTERS INTO SYNAPTIC VESICLESR01MH050712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EDWARDS, ROBERT H · 1993 to 2011
$3.8M
Location and Function of VGLUT3F32MH068085 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI SEAL, REBECCA P · 2003 to 2004
$102k
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA010154NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH068085NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amacrine cells constitute a diverse class of interneurons that contribute to visual signal processing in the inner retina, but surprisingly, little is known about the physiology of most amacrine cell subtypes. Here, we have taken advantage of the sparse expression of vesicular glutamate transporter 3 (VGLUT3) in the mammalian retina to target the expression of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) to a unique population of amacrine cells using a new transgenic mouse line. Electrophysiological recordings made from YFP-positive (VGLUT3+) amacrine cells provide the first functional data regarding the active membrane properties and synaptic connections of this recently identified cell type. We found that VGLUT3+ amacrine cells receive direct synaptic input from bipolar cells via both N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) and non-NMDARs. Voltage-gated sodium channels amplified these excitatory inputs but repetitive spiking was never observed. VGLUT3+ amacrine cells responded transiently to both light increments (ON response) and decrements (OFF response); ON responses consisted exclusively of inhibitory inputs, while OFF responses comprised both excitatory and inhibitory components, although the inhibitory conductance was larger in amplitude and longer in time course. The physiological properties and anatomical features of the VGLUT3+ amacrine cells suggest that this bistratified interneuron may play a role in disinhibitory signaling and/or crossover inhibition between parallel pathways in the retina.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAmino Acid Transport Systems, AcidicAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiophysicsCadmium ChlorideExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIn Vitro TechniquesLightMembrane PotentialsMiceMice, TransgenicPeptidesRetinaAmino Acid Transport Systems, AcidicCadmium ChlorideExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsiberiotoxinPeptidesSlc17a8 protein, mouseSodium Channel BlockersTetrodotoxin

Identifiers

PMID21864449
PMCPMC4150031
OpenAlexW2100008540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.