Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21863322›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2012

Liquefaction necrosis of mitral annular calcification (LNMAC): review of pathology, prevalence, imaging and management: proposed diagnostic imaging criteria with detailed multi-modality and MRI image characterization.

S Sanjay Srivatsa, Michael D Taylor, Kan Hor, David A Collins, Melissa King-Strunk, Robert A Pelberg, Wojciech Mazur

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Caseous Calcification of the Mitral Annulus.Journal of radiology case reports · 2019
    Article
  5. Caseous Necrosis of Mitral Annulus.Case reports in radiology · 2015
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Dynamic nature of caseous mitral annular calcification.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S Sanjay SrivatsaDivision of Cardiology, Fresno Community Hospital, California Heart Medical Associates, 7215 N Fresno St # 103, Fresno, CA 93720, USA. SSriv97589@aol.com
Michael D Taylor
Kan Hor
David A Collins
Melissa King-Strunk
Robert A Pelberg
Wojciech Mazur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquefactive necrosis within a large spheroid zone of mitral annular calcification (LNMAC) is an atypical but increasingly recognized variant of mitral annular calcification (MAC). Proposed MRI, echo, and CT imaging criteria for diagnosis of this unusual disease entity are discussed along with a review of the prognosis, histopathology, and management implications. A comprehensive ECHO, CT, and MRI imaging approach to diagnostic differentiation from other cardiac masses, allowing characterization of the differing components of this unusual lesion is emphasized. Differentiation from surrounding myocardium, and demonstration of peripheral ring type hyperenhancement, or hyperintense signal in the wall of this lesion, seen with specific inversion recovery MRI sequences is presented as a major diagnostic criterion. The relationship of these MRI image findings to underlying pathology is also discussed. An illustrative case vignette is provided for clinical reference.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedCalcinosisEchocardiographyHeart Valve DiseasesHumansIncidenceMaleMitral ValveNecrosisPredictive Value of TestsPrevalencePrognosisTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.