Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21862976›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2011

Genetics of vesicoureteral reflux.

Prem Puri, Jan-Hendrik Gosemann, John Darlow, David E Barton

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Primary vesicoureteral reflux.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex effects in pyelonephritis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  14. Association of Genetic Polymorphisms inIranian journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genetics of Vesicoureteral Reflux.Current genomics · 2016
    Article
  19. Relevance of current guidelines in the management of VUR.European journal of pediatrics · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Prem PuriNational Children's Research Centre, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland. prem.puri@ucd.ie
Jan-Hendrik Gosemann
John Darlow
David E Barton
Our Lady's Hospital · IEChildren's Health Ireland at Crumlin · IENational Children’s Research Centre · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common urological anomaly in children, affecting 1-2% of the pediatric population and 30-40% of children presenting with urinary tract infections (UTIs). Reflux-associated nephropathy is a major cause of childhood hypertension and chronic renal failure. The hereditary and familial nature of VUR is well recognized and several studies have reported that siblings of children with VUR have a higher incidence of reflux than the general pediatric population. Familial clustering of VUR implies that genetic factors have an important role in its pathogenesis, but no single major locus or gene for VUR has yet been identified and most researchers now acknowledge that VUR is genetically heterogeneous. Improvements in genome-scan techniques and continuously increasing knowledge of the genetic basis of VUR should help us to further understand its pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retSyndromeVesico-Ureteral RefluxGDNF protein, humanGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21862976
OpenAlexW1963943037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.