ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011
Integration of SNP genotyping confidence scores in IBD inference.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- geck: trio-based comparative benchmarking of variant calls.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Genome-wide patterns of identity-by-descent sharing in the French Canadian founder population.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014Article
- Isolated foveal hypoplasia with secondary nystagmus and low vision is associated with a homozygous SLC38A8 mutation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014Article
- Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees.Genetic epidemiology · 2014Article
- Deciphering the fine-structure of tribal admixture in the Bedouin population using genomic data.Heredity · 2014Article
- Unlocking the bottleneck in forward genetics using whole-genome sequencing and identity by descent to isolate causative mutations.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- The role of large pedigrees in an era of high-throughput sequencing.Human genetics · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationHigh-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays have become the standard platform for linkage and association analyses. The high SNP density of these platforms allows high-resolution identification of ancestral recombination events even for distant relatives many generations apart. However, such inference is sensitive to marker mistyping and current error detection methods rely on the genotyping of additional close relatives. Genotyping algorithms provide a confidence score for each marker call that is currently not integrated in existing methods. There is a need for a model that incorporates this prior information within the standard identical by descent (IBD) and association analyses.
resultsWe propose a novel model that incorporates marker confidence scores within IBD methods based on the Lander-Green Hidden Markov Model. The novel parameter of this model is the joint distribution of confidence scores and error status per array. We estimate this probability distribution by applying a modified expectation-maximization (EM) procedure on data from nuclear families genotyped with Affymetrix 250K SNP arrays. The converged tables from two different genotyping algorithms are shown for a wide range of error rates. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method in refining the detection of IBD signals using nuclear pedigrees and distant relatives. AVAILABILITY: Plinke, a new version of Plink with an extended pairwise IBD inference model allowing per marker error probabilities is freely available at: http://bioinfo.bgu.ac.il/bsu/software/plinke. CONTACT: obirk@bgu.ac.il; markusb@bgu.ac.il SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.