Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21861904›Full record

ArticleChemistry Central journal2011

Current status of multiple antigen-presenting peptide vaccine systems: Application of organic and inorganic nanoparticles.

Yoshio Fujita, Hiroaki Taguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry Central journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Peptide-based vaccine for cancer therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Current Prospects in Peptide-Based Subunit Nanovaccines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. A comprehensive and critical overview of schistosomiasis vaccine candidates.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nanoparticle systems for cancer vaccine.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. In Situ Capture of Bacterial Toxins for Antivirulence Vaccination.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoshio FujitaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Suzuka University of Medical Science, 3500-3, Minami-Tamagaki, Suzuka 513-8670, MIE, Japan. yfujita@suzuka-u.ac.jp.
Hiroaki Taguchi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies are currently investigating the development of safe and effective vaccines to prevent various infectious diseases. Multiple antigen-presenting peptide vaccine systems have been developed to avoid the adverse effects associated with conventional vaccines (i.e., live-attenuated, killed or inactivated pathogens), carrier proteins and cytotoxic adjuvants. Recently, two main approaches have been used to develop multiple antigen-presenting peptide vaccine systems: (1) the addition of functional components, e.g., T-cell epitopes, cell-penetrating peptides, and lipophilic moieties; and (2) synthetic approaches using size-defined nanomaterials, e.g., self-assembling peptides, non-peptidic dendrimers, and gold nanoparticles, as antigen-displaying platforms. This review summarizes the recent experimental studies directed to the development of multiple antigen-presenting peptide vaccine systems.

Identifiers

PMID21861904
PMCPMC3178480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.