Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21861601›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2011

Who is the key worker in palliative home care?

Trine Brogaard, Anders Bonde Jensen, Ineta Sokolowski, Frede Olesen, Mette Asbjørn Neergaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Danish general practitioners' self-reported competences in end-of-life care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Coordination of care for individuals with advanced progressive conditions: a multi-site ethnographic and serial interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Trine BrogaardResearch Unit for General Practice and Department of Family Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Bartholins Alle 2, Aarhus, Denmark. trine.brogaard@alm.au.dk
Anders Bonde Jensen
Ineta Sokolowski
Frede Olesen
Mette Asbjørn Neergaard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePalliative home care involves coordination of care between the professionals involved. The NICE guideline on supportive and palliative care (UK) recommends that teams, regardless of their base, should promote continuity for patients. This may involve nomination of a coordinating "key worker". This study aimed to explore who acts as key worker and who ought to take on this role in the views of patients, relatives, and primary care professionals. Furthermore, it aimed to explore the level of agreement on this issue between study participants.

designInterview and questionnaire study.

settingFormer County of Aarhus, Denmark (2008-2009). SUBJECTS: Ninety-six terminally ill cancer patients, their relatives, general practitioners (GPs), and community nurses (CNs).

main outcome measuresActual key worker as valued by patients, relatives, and primary care professionals; ideal key worker as valued by patients and relatives. RESULTS. Patients, relatives, GPs, and CNs most often saw themselves as having been the key worker. When asked about the ideal key worker, most patients (29%; 95%CI: 18;42) and relatives (32%; 95%CI: 22;45) pointed to the GP. Using patients' views as reference, we found very limited agreement with relatives (47.7%; k = 0.05), with GPs (30.4%; k = 0.01) and with CNs (25.0%; k = 0.04). Agreement between patients and relatives on the identity of the ideal key worker was of a similar dimension (29.6%; k = 0.11).

conclusionPoor agreement between patients, relatives, and professionals on actual and ideal key worker emphasizes the need for matching expectations and clear communication about task distribution in palliative home care.

Indexed as

CaregiversHome Care ServicesPalliative CareTerminal CareAdultCommunicationCommunity Health NursingContinuity of Patient CareDenmarkFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleNeoplasmsPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21861601
PMCPMC3347960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.