Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21861599›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2011

General practitioners' experiences using cognitive behavioural therapy in general practice: a qualitative study.

Bente Aschim, Sverre Lundevall, Egil W Martinsen, Jan C Frich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Patients With Cancer.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bente AschimFagerborglegene, Rosenborggata 9, Oslo, Norway. bentema@online.no
Sverre Lundevall
Egil W Martinsen
Jan C Frich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore GPs' experiences using cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), with a focus on factors that promote or limit the use of CBT in general practice.

designQualitative study using data from written evaluation reports and focus-group interviews. Setting. Norwegian general practice. SUBJECTS: GPs who participated in a longitudinal CBT course in the continuous medical education (CME) programme for GPs in Norway, of whom 19 filled in evaluation forms and 15 participated in focus-group interviews.

main outcome measuresExperiences with the use of CBT in general practice.

resultsGPs used CBT mainly in the treatment of patients with anxiety disorders and depression. Factors that promoted the use of CBT in general practice were structured supervision and group counselling, receiving feedback on individual video-recorded consultations, and experiencing that one mastered the therapeutic techniques. Limiting factors were that it took some time before one mastered the techniques, lack of eligible patients, constraints related to attending group supervision during office hours, and the lack of financial incentives to use CBT in general practice.

conclusionTailored training programmes in CBT for GPs may contribute to more frequent use of CBT in general practice. A formal recognition of CBT in the reimbursement scheme for GPs might counter limiting factors to an increased use of CBT in general practice.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyGeneral PracticeAnxiety DisordersClinical CompetenceDepressionEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleFocus GroupsGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleNorwayPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21861599
PMCPMC3347956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.