Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21861095›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2012

The role of conditioning history and reinforcer strength in the reinforcement enhancing effects of nicotine in rats.

Matthew I Palmatier, Laura C O'Brien, Melanie J Hall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Stimulus functions of nicotine.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Nicotine Enhances Footshock- and Lithium Chloride-Conditioned Place Avoidance in Male Rats.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Behavioral mechanisms underlying nicotine reinforcement.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew I PalmatierDepartment of Psychology, Kansas State University, 469 Bluemont Hall, 1100 Mid Campus Drive, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. mattyp@ksu.edu
Laura C O'Brien
Melanie J Hall
Kansas State University · US

Funding

Nicotine Self-Administration: Tobacco PharmacotherapiesR21DA024801 · NIDA · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PALMATIER, MATTHEW I · 2008 to 2009
$397k
NIDA NIH HHS DA-24801NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA024801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleNicotine (NIC) administration can increase behaviors that result in delivery of non-drug reinforcers (e.g., salient sensory stimuli). However, little is known about the circumstances under which NIC increases these behaviors.

objectiveThe present studies sought to extend the reinforcement enhancing effects of NIC to sucrose rewards for which intensity could be systematically manipulated.

methodIn Experiment 1, rats were trained to respond for sucrose (30% w/v) on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement and were pretreated with NIC (0.4 mg/kg free-base) or physiological saline (SAL). The intensity of the sucrose reward was manipulated over subsequent testing sessions (0-60% w/v). Similar procedures were used in Experiment 2; however, each subject received only one sucrose concentration (0-20%) to control for conditioning history. In Experiment 3, a fixed ratio 3 (FR3) schedule of reinforcement was used to investigate putative activating effects of NIC. Experiment 4 investigated whether NIC pretreatment would reduce sucrose intake in limited-access drinks.

resultsIn Experiment 1, NIC increased the motivation to obtain all sucrose concentrations, including water. However, when conditioning history was controlled (Experiment 2) the reinforcement enhancing effects of NIC were systematically related to the strength of the reinforcer. In Experiment 3, NIC neither increased nor decreased responding for sucrose. In Experiment 4, NIC reduced sucrose intake, but only at concentrations that resulted in peak drink volumes (5-20%).

conclusionThe results suggest that the reinforcement enhancing effects of NIC depend on conditioning history and do not appear to be the result of simple behavioral activation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, PsychologicalMaleMotivationNicotineNicotinic AgonistsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReinforcement ScheduleRewardSucroseNicotineNicotinic AgonistsSucrose

Identifiers

PMID21861095
OpenAlexW1984675245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.