Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21860620›Full record

ArticleAdvances in urology2012

Radiographic evaluation of children with febrile urinary tract infection: bottom-up, top-down, or none of the above?

Michaella M Prasad, Earl Y Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Paediatric Urinary Tract Infection: A Hospital Based Experience.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Detecting reflux: does ureteric jet Doppler waveform have a role?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013
    Article
  10. The role of voiding cystourethrography in the investigation of children with urinary tract infections.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michaella M PrasadDivision of Urology, Children's Memorial Hospital, 2300 Children's Plaza, P.O. Box 24, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
Earl Y Cheng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proper algorithm for the radiographic evaluation of children with febrile urinary tract infection (FUTI) is hotly debated. Three studies are commonly administered: renal-bladder ultrasound (RUS), voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), and dimercapto-succinic acid (DMSA) scan. However, the order in which these tests are obtained depends on the methodology followed: bottom-up or top-down. Each strategy carries advantages and disadvantages, and some groups now advocate even less of a workup (none of the above) due to the current controversies about treatment when abnormalities are diagnosed. New technology is available and still under investigation, but it may help to clarify the interplay between vesicoureteral reflux, renal scarring, and dysfunctional elimination in the future.

Identifiers

PMID21860620
PMCPMC3155794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.