Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21860033›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2011

Molecular mechanisms in 22q11 deletion syndrome.

Nigel M Williams

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. microRNAs as novel biomarkers of schizophrenia (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychopathology and cognition in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nigel M WilliamsDepartment of Psychological Medicine and Neurology, MRC Centre in Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK. williamsnm@cf.ac.uk
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now well recognized that as well as having a characteristic facial dysmorphology and a range of congenital abnormalities, individuals with chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) have a greatly increased risk of developing psychosis, in particular schizophrenia. The majority of deletions span a large 3Mb region at 22q11. However, the presence of affected individuals carrying smaller deletions have not been sufficient to satisfactorily reduce the critical region for the behavioral phenotype beyond a ~1.5Mb region that contains at least 28 genes. By having a shared genetic variant that greatly increases risk to psychosis, individuals with 22q11DS are a relatively homogeneous population to study psychiatric disease. Despite this, the large volume of research performed over the last 15 years suggest that the mechanism by which haploinsufficiency at 22q11 increases risk to psychiatric illness is likely to be complex and it remains uncertain why individuals carrying identical 22q11 deletions can present with such a wide range of neuropsychiatric phenotypes. This review will therefore consider the ways in which deletions at 22q11 are expected to increase risk to develop psychiatric disease by summarizing the work that has been done to investigate three of the most likely disease causing mechanisms: (a) gene dosage sensitivity; (b) unmasking of recessive alleles or functional polymorphism; and (c) position effect.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22Gene DeletionGene DosagePolymorphism, Genetic22q11 Deletion SyndromeHumans

Identifiers

PMID21860033
PMCPMC3160222
OpenAlexW2068252692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.