Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21858640›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2011

Biomolecular structure refinement using the GROMOS simulation software.

Nathan Schmid, Jane R Allison, Jožica Dolenc, Andreas P Eichenberger, Anna-Pitschna E Kunz, Wilfred F van Gunsteren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fluctuating β-Sheet Secondary Structure in DS119 Explains the Small Effects of Backbone N-Amination on Thermal Stability.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. On the use ofJournal of biomolecular NMR · 2021
    Article
  10. Molecular Conformations of Di-, Tri-, and Tetra-International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan SchmidLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Jane R Allison
Jožica Dolenc
Andreas P Eichenberger
Anna-Pitschna E Kunz
Wilfred F van Gunsteren

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the understanding of cellular processes the molecular structure of biomolecules has to be accurately determined. Initial models can be significantly improved by structure refinement techniques. Here, we present the refinement methods and analysis techniques implemented in the GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation. The methodology and some implementation details of the computation of NMR NOE data, (3)J-couplings and residual dipolar couplings, X-ray scattering intensities from crystals and solutions and neutron scattering intensities used in GROMOS is described and refinement strategies and concepts are discussed using example applications. The GROMOS software allows structure refinement combining different types of experimental data with different types of restraining functions, while using a variety of methods to enhance conformational searching and sampling and the thermodynamically calibrated GROMOS force field for biomolecular simulation.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationSoftwareNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProteinsThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.