Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21857989›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Genome size, karyotype polymorphism and chromosomal evolution in Trypanosoma cruzi.

Renata T Souza, Fábio M Lima, Roberto Moraes Barros, Danielle R Cortez, Michele F Santos, Esteban M Cordero, Jeronimo Conceiçao Ruiz, Samuel Goldenberg, Marta M G Teixeira, José Franco da Silveira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ClinicalbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fifteen Years after the Definition ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microevolution ofeLife · 2022
    Article
  15. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. AssessingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Renata T SouzaDepartamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fábio M Lima
Roberto Moraes Barros
Danielle R Cortez
Michele F Santos
Esteban M Cordero
Jeronimo Conceiçao Ruiz
Samuel Goldenberg
Marta M G Teixeira
José Franco da Silveira
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRFundação Carlos Chagas · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Trypanosoma cruzi genome was sequenced from a hybrid strain (CL Brener). However, high allelic variation and the repetitive nature of the genome have prevented the complete linear sequence of chromosomes being determined. Determining the full complement of chromosomes and establishing syntenic groups will be important in defining the structure of T. cruzi chromosomes. A large amount of information is now available for T. cruzi and Trypanosoma brucei, providing the opportunity to compare and describe the overall patterns of chromosomal evolution in these parasites. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe genome sizes, repetitive DNA contents, and the numbers and sizes of chromosomes of nine strains of T. cruzi from four lineages (TcI, TcII, TcV and TcVI) were determined. The genome of the TcI group was statistically smaller than other lineages, with the exception of the TcI isolate Tc1161 (José-IMT). Satellite DNA content was correlated with genome size for all isolates, but this was not accompanied by simultaneous amplification of retrotransposons. Regardless of chromosomal polymorphism, large syntenic groups are conserved among T. cruzi lineages. Duplicated chromosome-sized regions were identified and could be retained as paralogous loci, increasing the dosage of several genes. By comparing T. cruzi and T. brucei chromosomes, homologous chromosomal regions in T. brucei were identified. Chromosomes Tb9 and Tb11 of T. brucei share regions of syntenic homology with three and six T. cruzi chromosomal bands, respectively.

conclusionsDespite genome size variation and karyotype polymorphism, T. cruzi lineages exhibit conservation of chromosome structure. Several syntenic groups are conserved among all isolates analyzed in this study. The syntenic regions are larger than expected if rearrangements occur randomly, suggesting that they are conserved owing to positive selection. Mapping of the syntenic regions on T. cruzi chromosomal bands provides evidence for the occurrence of fusion and split events involving T. brucei and T. cruzi chromosomes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome SizePolymorphism, GeneticChromosome MappingChromosomesDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, ProtozoanDNA, SatelliteElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenome, ProtozoanKaryotypeSpecies SpecificitySyntenyTrypanosoma brucei bruceiTrypanosoma cruziDNA, ProtozoanDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID21857989
PMCPMC3155523
OpenAlexW2059980913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.