ArticlePloS one2011
DNA barcode sequence identification incorporating taxonomic hierarchy and within taxon variability.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate Identification of Key Groups of Microeukaryotes Using Multimodal Deep Learning: An Integrated Classification Model Combining Morphological and Molecular Data.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- DNA Barcode Authentication of Devil's Claw Herbal Dietary Supplements.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Applied Barcoding: The Practicalities of DNA Testing for Herbals.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The Application and Limitation of Universal Chloroplast Markers in Discriminating East Asian Evergreen Oaks.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Article
- Alignment-free sequence comparison: benefits, applications, and tools.Genome biology · 2017Review
- Utility of DNA barcoding to identify rare endemic vascular plant species in Trinidad.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
- Field-based species identification of closely-related plants using real-time nanopore sequencing.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Using Next-Generation Sequencing for DNA Barcoding: Capturing Allelic Variation in ITS2.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- MISSEL: a method to identify a large number of small species-specific genomic subsequences and its application to viruses classification.BioData mining · 2016Article
- Bamboo tea: reduction of taxonomic complexity and application of DNA diagnostics based onPeerJ · 2016Article
- The Use of DNA Barcoding in Identification and Conservation of Rosewood (Dalbergia spp.).PloS one · 2015Article
- DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match.Biology letters · 2014Article
- Supervised DNA Barcodes species classification: analysis, comparisons and results.BioData mining · 2014Article
- Identification of sequestered chloroplasts in photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic sacoglossan sea slugs (Mollusca, Gastropoda).Frontiers in zoology · 2014Article
- DNA barcode authentication of saw palmetto herbal dietary supplements.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Scrapheap challenge: a novel bulk-bone metabarcoding method to investigate ancient DNA in faunal assemblages.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Article
- DNA barcoding the Canadian Arctic flora: core plastid barcodes (rbcL + matK) for 490 vascular plant species.PloS one · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For DNA barcoding to succeed as a scientific endeavor an accurate and expeditious query sequence identification method is needed. Although a global multiple-sequence alignment can be generated for some barcoding markers (e.g. COI, rbcL), not all barcoding markers are as structurally conserved (e.g. matK). Thus, algorithms that depend on global multiple-sequence alignments are not universally applicable. Some sequence identification methods that use local pairwise alignments (e.g. BLAST) are unable to accurately differentiate between highly similar sequences and are not designed to cope with hierarchic phylogenetic relationships or within taxon variability. Here, I present a novel alignment-free sequence identification algorithm--BRONX--that accounts for observed within taxon variability and hierarchic relationships among taxa. BRONX identifies short variable segments and corresponding invariant flanking regions in reference sequences. These flanking regions are used to score variable regions in the query sequence without the production of a global multiple-sequence alignment. By incorporating observed within taxon variability into the scoring procedure, misidentifications arising from shared alleles/haplotypes are minimized. An explicit treatment of more inclusive terminals allows for separate identifications to be made for each taxonomic level and/or for user-defined terminals. BRONX performs better than all other methods when there is imperfect overlap between query and reference sequences (e.g. mini-barcode queries against a full-length barcode database). BRONX consistently produced better identifications at the genus-level for all query types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.