Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21856822›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

β-lactams and florfenicol antibiotics remain bioactive in soils while ciprofloxacin, neomycin, and tetracycline are neutralized.

Murugan Subbiah, Shannon M Mitchell, Jeffrey L Ullman, Douglas R Call

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detection of anAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Identification of the Multiresistance GenePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Deploying Elemental Iodine in a Vapor Form to Disinfect Water and to Clear Biofilms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cu(II)-catalyzed degradation of ampicillin: effect of pH and dissolved oxygen.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Murugan SubbiahDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, 402 Bustad Hall, Pullman, WA 99164-7040, USA.
Shannon M Mitchell
Jeffrey L Ullman
Douglas R Call
University of Florida · US

Funding

FOOD &WATERBORNE DISEASES INTEGRATED RESEARCH NETWORK, ZOONOES RESEAR-N01AI030055 · NIAID · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · 2003 to 2003
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is generally assumed that antibiotic residues in soils select for antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This assumption was tested by separately adding 10 different antibiotics (≥200 ppm) to three soil-water slurries (silt-loam, sand-loam, and sand; 20% soil [wt/vol]) and incubating mixtures for 24 h at room temperature. The antibiotic activity of the resultant supernatant was assessed by culturing a sensitive Escherichia coli strain in the filter-sterilized supernatant augmented with Luria-Bertani broth. We found striking differences in the abilities of supernatants to suppress growth of the indicator E. coli. Ampicillin, cephalothin, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, and florfenicol supernatants completely inhibited growth while bacterial growth was uninhibited in the presence of neomycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin supernatants. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis demonstrated that cefoxitin and florfenicol were almost completely retained in the supernatants, whereas tetracycline and ciprofloxacin were mostly removed. Antibiotic dissipation in soil, presumably dominated by adsorption mechanisms, was sufficient to neutralize 200 ppm of tetracycline; this concentration is considerably higher than reported contamination levels. Soil pellets from the tetracycline slurries were resuspended in a minimal volume of medium to maximize the interaction between bacteria and soil particles, but sensitive bacteria were still unaffected by tetracycline (P = 0.6). Thus, residual antibiotics in soil do not necessarily exert a selective pressure, and the degree to which the pharmaceutical remains bioactive depends on the antibiotic. Efforts to control antibiotic contamination would be better directed toward compounds that retain biological activity in soils (e.g., cephalosporins and florfenicol) because these are the antibiotics that could exert a selective pressure in the environment.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAdsorptionAnti-Bacterial AgentsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidEscherichia coliSelection, GeneticSoilAnti-Bacterial AgentsSoil

Identifiers

PMID21856822
PMCPMC3194842
OpenAlexW2101041306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.