Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21856442›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2011

Toward automated consumer question answering: automatically separating consumer questions from professional questions in the healthcare domain.

Feifan Liu, Lamont D Antieau, Hong Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. quEHRy: a question answering system to query electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  3. A conversational agent system for dietary supplements use.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Qcorp: an annotated classification corpus of Chinese health questions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interactive use of online health resources: a comparison of consumer and professional questions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
  10. Annotating Logical Forms for EHR Questions.LREC ... International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation · 2016
    Article
  11. Resource Classification for Medical Questions.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016
    Article
  12. Automatically classifying question types for consumer health questions.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Feifan LiuDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, United States. liuf@uwm.edu
Lamont D Antieau
Hong Yu

Funding

Exploring Natural Language Processing, Image Processing, Machine Learning, and UsR01GM095476 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI YU, HONG · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
HERMES - Help physicians to Extract and aRticulate Multimedia information from liR01LM009836 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI YU, HONG · 2007 to 2009
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095476NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBoth healthcare professionals and healthcare consumers have information needs that can be met through the use of computers, specifically via medical question answering systems. However, the information needs of both groups are different in terms of literacy levels and technical expertise, and an effective question answering system must be able to account for these differences if it is to formulate the most relevant responses for users from each group. In this paper, we propose that a first step toward answering the queries of different users is automatically classifying questions according to whether they were asked by healthcare professionals or consumers.

designWe obtained two sets of consumer questions (~10,000 questions in total) from Yahoo answers. The professional questions consist of two question collections: 4654 point-of-care questions (denoted as PointCare) obtained from interviews of a group of family doctors following patient visits and 5378 questions from physician practices through professional online services (denoted as OnlinePractice). With more than 20,000 questions combined, we developed supervised machine-learning models for automatic classification between consumer questions and professional questions. To evaluate the robustness of our models, we tested the model that was trained on the Consumer-PointCare dataset on the Consumer-OnlinePractice dataset. We evaluated both linguistic features and statistical features and examined how the characteristics in two different types of professional questions (PointCare vs. OnlinePractice) may affect the classification performance. We explored information gain for feature reduction and the back-off linguistic category features.

resultsThe 10-fold cross-validation results showed the best F1-measure of 0.936 and 0.946 on Consumer-PointCare and Consumer-OnlinePractice respectively, and the best F1-measure of 0.891 when testing the Consumer-PointCare model on the Consumer-OnlinePractice dataset.

conclusionHealthcare consumer questions posted at Yahoo online communities can be reliably classified from professional questions posted by point-of-care clinicians and online physicians. The supervised machine-learning models are robust for this task. Our study will significantly benefit further development in automated consumer question answering.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCommunity ParticipationDelivery of Health CarePoint-of-Care SystemsDatabases, FactualHumansInformation DisseminationInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetNatural Language ProcessingSemantics

Identifiers

PMID21856442
PMCPMC3226885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.