ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2011
Toward automated consumer question answering: automatically separating consumer questions from professional questions in the healthcare domain.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semantic classification of Indonesian consumer health questions.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025Article
- quEHRy: a question answering system to query electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- A conversational agent system for dietary supplements use.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Search like an expert: Reducing expertise disparity using a hybrid neural index for COVID-19 queries.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2022Article
- Consumer health information and question answering: helping consumers find answers to their health-related information needs.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Qcorp: an annotated classification corpus of Chinese health questions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Semantic annotation of consumer health questions.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Classifying Chinese Questions Related to Health Care Posted by Consumers Via the Internet.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Interactive use of online health resources: a comparison of consumer and professional questions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Annotating Logical Forms for EHR Questions.LREC ... International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation · 2016Article
- Resource Classification for Medical Questions.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016Article
- Automatically classifying question types for consumer health questions.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014Article
- Text classification for assisting moderators in online health communities.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBoth healthcare professionals and healthcare consumers have information needs that can be met through the use of computers, specifically via medical question answering systems. However, the information needs of both groups are different in terms of literacy levels and technical expertise, and an effective question answering system must be able to account for these differences if it is to formulate the most relevant responses for users from each group. In this paper, we propose that a first step toward answering the queries of different users is automatically classifying questions according to whether they were asked by healthcare professionals or consumers.
designWe obtained two sets of consumer questions (~10,000 questions in total) from Yahoo answers. The professional questions consist of two question collections: 4654 point-of-care questions (denoted as PointCare) obtained from interviews of a group of family doctors following patient visits and 5378 questions from physician practices through professional online services (denoted as OnlinePractice). With more than 20,000 questions combined, we developed supervised machine-learning models for automatic classification between consumer questions and professional questions. To evaluate the robustness of our models, we tested the model that was trained on the Consumer-PointCare dataset on the Consumer-OnlinePractice dataset. We evaluated both linguistic features and statistical features and examined how the characteristics in two different types of professional questions (PointCare vs. OnlinePractice) may affect the classification performance. We explored information gain for feature reduction and the back-off linguistic category features.
resultsThe 10-fold cross-validation results showed the best F1-measure of 0.936 and 0.946 on Consumer-PointCare and Consumer-OnlinePractice respectively, and the best F1-measure of 0.891 when testing the Consumer-PointCare model on the Consumer-OnlinePractice dataset.
conclusionHealthcare consumer questions posted at Yahoo online communities can be reliably classified from professional questions posted by point-of-care clinicians and online physicians. The supervised machine-learning models are robust for this task. Our study will significantly benefit further development in automated consumer question answering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.