Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21856440›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2011

Applying semantic-based probabilistic context-free grammar to medical language processing--a preliminary study on parsing medication sentences.

Hua Xu, Samir AbdelRahman, Yanxin Lu, Joshua C Denny, Son Doan

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hua XuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. hua.xu@vanderbilt.edu
Samir AbdelRahman
Yanxin Lu
Joshua C Denny
Son Doan

Funding

Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records ProjectU01HG004603 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2007 to 2011
$7.3M
An in-silico method for epidemiological studies using Electronic Medical RecordsR01CA141307 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI XU, HUA · 2009 to 2012
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA141307NCI NIH HHS R01CA141307NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantic-based sublanguage grammars have been shown to be an efficient method for medical language processing. However, given the complexity of the medical domain, parsers using such grammars inevitably encounter ambiguous sentences, which could be interpreted by different groups of production rules and consequently result in two or more parse trees. One possible solution, which has not been extensively explored previously, is to augment productions in medical sublanguage grammars with probabilities to resolve the ambiguity. In this study, we associated probabilities with production rules in a semantic-based grammar for medication findings and evaluated its performance on reducing parsing ambiguity. Using the existing data set from 2009 i2b2 NLP (Natural Language Processing) challenge for medication extraction, we developed a semantic-based CFG (Context Free Grammar) for parsing medication sentences and manually created a Treebank of 4564 medication sentences from discharge summaries. Using the Treebank, we derived a semantic-based PCFG (Probabilistic Context Free Grammar) for parsing medication sentences. Our evaluation using a 10-fold cross validation showed that the PCFG parser dramatically improved parsing performance when compared to the CFG parser.

Indexed as

Medication Systems, HospitalNatural Language ProcessingSemanticsDatabases, FactualProbabilityTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21856440
PMCPMC3226929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.