Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21856407›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience2011

Developmental differences in peripheral glabrous skin mechanosensory nerve receptive field and intracellular electrophysiologic properties: phenotypic characterization in infant and juvenile rats.

M Danilo Boada, Silvia Gutierrez, Timothy Houle, James C Eisenach, Douglas G Ririe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Danilo BoadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009, USA. mboada@wakehealth.edu
Silvia Gutierrez
Timothy Houle
James C Eisenach
Douglas G Ririe

Funding

Spinal Noradrenergic Sprouting after Nerve InjuryR01NS057594 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EISENACH, JAMES · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
Neurophysiologic Development Responses to SurgeryK08GM072105 · NIGMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RIRIE, DOUGLAS G · 2004 to 2007
$485k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM72105NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM072105NINDS NIH HHS NS57594NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental differences in peripheral neuron characteristics and functionality exist. Direct measurement of active and passive electrophysiologic and receptive field characteristics of single mechanosensitive neurons in glabrous skin was performed and phenotypic characterization of fiber subtypes was applied to analyze developmental differences in peripheral mechanosensitive afferents. After Institutional approval, male Sprague-Dawley infant (P7: postnatal day 7) and juvenile (P28) rats were anesthetized and single cell intracellular electrophysiology was performed in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) soma of mechanosensitive cells with receptive field (RF) in the glabrous skin of the hindpaw. Passive and active electrical properties of the cells and RF size and characteristics determined. Fiber subtype classification was performed and developmental differences in fiber subtype properties analyzed. RF size was smaller at P7 for both low and high threshold mechanoreceptor (LTMR and HTMR) with no differences between A- and C-HTMR (AHTMR and CHTMR). The RF size was also correlated to anatomic location on glabrous skin, toes having smaller RF. Conduction velocity (CV) was adequate at P28 for AHTMR and CHTMR classification, but not at P7. Only width of the action potential at half height (D50) was significantly different between HTMR at P7, while D50, CV and amplitude of the AP were significant for HTMR at P28. RF size is determined in part by the RF distribution of the peripheral neuron. Developmental differences in RF size occur with larger RF sizes occurring in younger animals. This is consistent with RF size differences determined by measuring RF in the spinal cord, except the peripheral RF is much smaller, more refined, and in some cases pinpoint. Developmental differences make CV alone unreliable for neuron classification. Utilizing integration of all measured parameters allows classification of neurons into subtypes even at the younger ages. This will prove important in understanding changes that occur in the peripheral sensory afferents in the face of ongoing development and injury early in life.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaFootGanglia, SpinalMaleMechanoreceptorsPeripheral NervesRatsSensory ThresholdsSkin

Identifiers

PMID21856407
PMCPMC3381879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.