Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21854280›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of drug and alcohol abuse2011

Some considerations for excess zeroes in substance abuse research.

Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Stacia M DeSantis, Jeffrey E Korte, Kathleen T Brady

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Premeditation moderates the relation between sensation seeking and risky substance use among young adults.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. From Mouth-level to Tooth-level DMFS: Conceptualizing a Theoretical Framework.Journal of dental, oral and craniofacial epidemiology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dipankar BandyopadhyayDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 29425, USA. bandyopd@gmail.com
Stacia M DeSantis
Jeffrey E Korte
Kathleen T Brady
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Southern Consortium Node of the Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA013727 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2000 to 2015
$34.4M
THE ROLE OF THE RNA BINDING PROTEIN LA IN ORAL TUMOR BIOLOGYP20RR017696 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KIRKWOOD, KEITH L · 2002 to 2011
$20.7M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017696NCRR NIH HHS P32-RR017696NIDA NIH HHS 5U10-DA013727NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCount data collected in substance abuse research often come with an excess of "zeroes," which are typically handled using zero-inflated regression models. However, there is a need to consider the design aspects of those studies before using such a statistical model to ascertain the sources of zeroes.

objectivesWe sought to illustrate hurdle models as alternatives to zero-inflated models to validate a two-stage decision-making process in situations of "excess zeroes."

methodsWe use data from a study of 45 cocaine-dependent subjects where the primary scientific question was to evaluate whether study participation influences drug-seeking behavior. The outcome, "the frequency (count) of cocaine use days per week," is bounded (ranging from 0 to 7). We fit and compare binomial, Poisson, negative binomial, and the hurdle version of these models to study the effect of gender, age, time, and study participation on cocaine use.

resultsThe hurdle binomial model provides the best fit. Gender and time are not predictive of use. Higher odds of use versus no use are associated with age; however once use is experienced, odds of further use decrease with increase in age. Participation was associated with higher odds of no-cocaine use; once there is use, participation reduced the odds of further use.

conclusionAge and study participation are significantly predictive of cocaine-use behavior. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: The two-stage decision process as modeled by a hurdle binomial model (appropriate for bounded count data with excess zeroes) provides interesting insights into the study of covariate effects on count responses of substance use, when all enrolled subjects are believed to be "at-risk" of use.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdultAge FactorsCocaine-Related DisordersDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoisson DistributionResearch SubjectsSex FactorsTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21854280
PMCPMC3297079
OpenAlexW2170105692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.