ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2012
Sprinter's motor signature does not change with fatigue.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Leg, Vertical, and Joint Stiffness in Running Performance: A Literature Overview.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2021Review
- Stiffness as a Risk Factor for Achilles Tendon Injury in Running Athletes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate human adaptations to fatigue induced by track sprint repetitions. Eight male sprinters were asked to run 4 × 100 m as quickly as possible with 3 min of recovery. Subjects were filmed (50 Hz) in order to measure stride length and frequency. Velocity was measured by means of radar (250 Hz) while contact and flight times were registered wirelessly by two pressure sensors (400 Hz) embedded under the insole of the subjects' shoes. Contact and flight times were used to calculate stiffness. In addition, blood samples were taken prior to warm-up, 1 min after each 100-m sprint and every 2 min after the last repetition until a lactate peak ([BLa]) was reached. [BLa] did not affect mechanical and stride parameters. Inter-series ANOVA showed that velocity decreased significantly (-3.55%) between Repetition 1 (8.18 ± 0.29 m s(-1)) and Repetition 4 (7.89 ± 0.42 m s(-1)), while [BLa] increased from 6.74 ± 1.15 to 13.58 ± 1.48 mmol l(-1) (p < 0.05). The first main result was that leg stiffness remained constant until Repetition 3 and then dramatically increased at Repetition 4, whereas vertical stiffness remained constant throughout all four repetitions. This behavior could be considered to be a neuromuscular adaptation to fatigue used by skilled athletes. The second main result was that velocity decreased during the second phase (30-80 m) of the entire 100 m. In addition, a PCA revealed three different sprint profiles explaining 88.2% of the total variance: the contact-time-pattern (39.46%), force-pattern (27.96%) and stride-pattern (20.77%). Two different motor signatures were identified with fatigue. In the first, athletes switch from the key variable to another when exhausted without changing their motor behavior (during Repetition 3 and/or Repetition 4). In the second, athletes do not change their motor behavior with fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.