Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21853265›Full record

Trial reportAge (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2012

Gut microbiota of healthy elderly NSAID users is selectively modified with the administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and lactitol.

Marika Björklund, Arthur C Ouwehand, Sofia D Forssten, Janne Nikkilä, Kirsti Tiihonen, Nina Rautonen, Sampo J Lahtinen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Prebiotics metabolism by gut-isolated probiotics.Journal of food science and technology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Diet Associated with Inflammation and Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marika BjörklundDanisco BioActives, Health and Nutrition, Sokeritehtaantie 20, Kantvik, Finland.
Arthur C Ouwehand
Sofia D Forssten
Janne Nikkilä
Kirsti Tiihonen
Nina Rautonen
Sampo J Lahtinen
Pharmatest (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ageing changes gut microbiota composition and alters immune system function. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics may improve the health status of elderly individuals by modifying the intestinal environment and the microbiota composition, and by stimulating the immune system. In this work, we studied the effects of synbiotic supplementation on the gut microbiota of healthy elderly volunteers. Fifty-one elders were randomly assigned to consume either a synbiotic dietary supplement or a placebo in addition to their usual diet for a 2-week period. The synbiotic product consisted of the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and the prebiotic lactitol and was ingested twice a day, with a total daily dose of 10 g lactitol and 2 × 10(10) cells of probiotic bacteria. Before, during and after the intervention period fecal quantities of six phylogenetic bacterial groups were determined using quantitative PCR, and relative changes in total microbiota composition were assessed by percent guanine-plus-cytosine profiling. The microbiota profiles showed certain relative changes within the microbial community, and indicated an increase of bifidobacteria levels during synbiotic supplementation. Quantification by PCR confirmed the in changes in the microbiota composition; for example increases in total levels of endogenous bifidobacteria and lactobacilli were recorded. Throughout the 6-week study period there was a decrease unrelated to intervention in the Blautia coccoides-Eubacterium rectale bacterial group levels and Clostridium cluster XIVab levels, but this decrease appeared to be halted during the synbiotic intervention. In conclusion, putatively beneficial changes in microbiota were observed in the elderly subjects supplemented with the synbiotic product.

Indexed as

Lactobacillus acidophilusAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAnalysis of VarianceAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalColony Count, MicrobialFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansLinear ModelsMaleMetagenomePrebioticsProbioticsProspective StudiesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidallactitolPrebioticsSugar Alcohols

Identifiers

PMID21853265
PMCPMC3682059
OpenAlexW2136172019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.