Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21853148›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Somaclonal variation is induced de novo via the tissue culture process: a study quantifying mutated cells in Saintpaulia.

Mitsuru Sato, Munetaka Hosokawa, Motoaki Doi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genomic consequences associated with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT markers based genetic stability assessment of micropropagatedPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cell Wall Epitopes and Endoploidy as Reporters of Embryogenic Potential inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mitsuru SatoGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Munetaka Hosokawa
Motoaki Doi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe origin of somaclonal variation has not been questioned previously, i.e., "pre-existing mutations" in explants and "newly induced mutations" arising from the tissue culture process have not been distinguished. This is primarily because there has been no reliable molecular method for estimating or quantifying variation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe adopted a petal-variegated cultivar of Saintpaulia 'Thamires' (Saintpaulia sp.) as the model plant. Based on the difference between the pre- and post-transposon excision sequence of the promoter region of flavonoid 3', 5'-hydoroxylase (F3'5'H), we estimated mutated (transposon-excised) cell percentages using a quantitative real-time PCR. Mutated cell percentages in leaf laminae used as explants was 4.6 and 2.4% in highly or low variegation flower plants, respectively, although the occurrences of blue color mutants in their regenerants were more than 40%. Preexisting mutated cell percentages in cultured explants were considerably lower than the mutated plant percentage among total regenerants via tissue culture. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The estimation of mutated cell percentages became possible using the quantitative real-time PCR. The origins of mutations were successfully distinguished; it was confirmed that somaclonal variations are mainly caused by newly generated mutations arising from tissue culture process.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationClone CellsFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantLamiaceaeModels, BiologicalMutationPhenotypePigmentationPlant LeavesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRegenerationReproducibility of ResultsTissue Culture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID21853148
PMCPMC3154937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.