Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21853072›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Early potent protection against heterologous SIVsmE660 challenge following live attenuated SIV vaccination in Mauritian cynomolgus macaques.

Neil Berry, Claire Ham, Edward T Mee, Nicola J Rose, Giada Mattiuzzo, Adrian Jenkins, Mark Page, William Elsley, Mark Robinson, Deborah Smith and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Variable BaselineFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neil BerryDivision of Retrovirology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Health Protection Agency, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom. neil.berry@nibsc.hpa.org.uk
Claire Ham
Edward T Mee
Nicola J Rose
Giada Mattiuzzo
Adrian Jenkins
Mark Page
William Elsley
Mark Robinson
Deborah Smith
Deborah Ferguson
Greg Towers
Neil Almond
Richard Stebbings
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GBMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600007Medical Research Council G0601201Medical Research Council G0801172Medical Research Council G0900950Medical Research Council G9025730Medical Research Council G9419998Medical Research Council G9721629Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 090940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLive attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) vaccines represent the most effective means of vaccinating macaques against pathogenic SIV challenge. However, thus far, protection has been demonstrated to be more effective against homologous than heterologous strains. Immune correlates of vaccine-induced protection have also been difficult to identify, particularly those measurable in the peripheral circulation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsHere we describe potent protection in 6 out of 8 Mauritian-derived cynomolgus macaques (MCM) against heterologous virus challenge with the pathogenic, uncloned SIVsmE660 viral stock following vaccination with live attenuated SIVmac251/C8. MCM provided a characterised host genetic background with limited Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) and TRIM5α allelic diversity. Early protection, observed as soon as 3 weeks post-vaccination, was comparable to that of 20 weeks vaccination. Recrudescence of vaccine virus was most pronounced in breakthrough cases where simultaneous identification of vaccine and challenge viruses by virus-specific PCR was indicative of active co-infection. Persistence of the vaccine virus in a range of lymphoid tissues was typified by a consistent level of SIV RNA positive cells in protected vaccinates. However, no association between MHC class I/II haplotype or TRIM5α polymorphism and study outcome was identified. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This SIV vaccine study, conducted in MHC-characterised MCM, demonstrated potent protection against the pathogenic, heterologous SIVsmE660 challenge stock after only 3 weeks vaccination. This level of protection against this viral stock by intravenous challenge has not been hitherto observed. The mechanism(s) of protection by vaccination with live attenuated SIV must account for the heterologous and early protection data described in this study, including those which relate to the innate immune system.

Indexed as

VaccinationAllelesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCarrier ProteinsDNA, ViralHaplotypesIn Situ HybridizationKineticsLymphocyte CountLymphoid TissueMacaca fascicularisMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMauritiusPolymorphism, GeneticAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCarrier ProteinsDNA, ViralRNA, ViralSAIDS VaccinesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID21853072
PMCPMC3154277
OpenAlexW1980723592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.