ArticlePloS one2011
Prediction of emergent heart failure death by semi-quantitative triage risk stratification.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk stratification scores for patients with acute heart failure in the Emergency Department: A systematic review.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2020Pooled it
- Risk stratification in acute heart failure: rationale and design of the STRATIFY and DECIDE studies.American heart journal · 2012Trial
- Electrocardiogram Electrode Positioning on the Back During Echocardiography: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Clinical support system for triage based on federated learning for the Korea triage and acuity scale.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Socioeconomic and Clinical Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Acute Dyspnea.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2021Article
- Comparison of Troponin Elevation, Prior Myocardial Infarction, and Chest Pain in Acute Ischemic Heart Failure.CJC open · 2020Article
- Comparison between Emergency Severity Index and Heart Failure Triage Scale in heart failure patients: A randomized clinical trial.World journal of emergency medicine · 2019Article
- Care Setting Intensity and Outcomes After Emergency Department Presentation Among Patients With Acute Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Article
- Low oxygen saturation and mortality in an adult cohort: the Tromsø study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2015Article
- The challenge of heart failure discharge from the emergency department.Current heart failure reports · 2012Article
- Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department: Respiratory Rate as a Risk Predictor.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesGeneric triage risk assessments are widely used in the emergency department (ED), but have not been validated for prediction of short-term risk among patients with acute heart failure (HF). Our objective was to evaluate the Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) for prediction of early death among HF patients.
methodsWe included patients presenting with HF to an ED in Ontario from Apr 2003 to Mar 2007. We used the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System and vital statistics databases to examine care and outcomes.
resultsAmong 68,380 patients (76±12 years, 49.4% men), early mortality was stratified with death rates of 9.9%, 1.9%, 0.9%, and 0.5% at 1-day, and 17.2%, 5.9%, 3.8%, and 2.5% at 7-days, for CTAS 1, 2, 3, and 4-5, respectively. Compared to lower acuity (CTAS 4-5) patients, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for 1-day death were 1.32 (95%CI; 0.93-1.88; p = 0.12) for CTAS 3, 2.41 (95%CI; 1.71-3.40; p<0.001) for CTAS 2, and highest for CTAS 1: 9.06 (95%CI; 6.28-13.06; p<0.001). Predictors of triage-critical (CTAS 1) status included oxygen saturation <90% (aOR 5.92, 95%CI; 3.09-11.81; p<0.001), respiratory rate >24 breaths/minute (aOR 1.96, 95%CI; 1.05-3.67; p = 0.034), and arrival by paramedic (aOR 3.52, 95%CI; 1.70-8.02; p = 0.001). While age/sex-adjusted CTAS score provided good discrimination for ED (c-statistic = 0.817) and 1-day (c-statistic = 0.724) death, mortality prediction was improved further after accounting for cardiac and non-cardiac co-morbidities (c-statistics 0.882 and 0.810, respectively; both p<0.001).
conclusionsA semi-quantitative triage acuity scale assigned at ED presentation and based largely on respiratory factors predicted emergent death among HF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.