Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21853017›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Polyphasic analysis of intraspecific diversity in Epicoccum nigrum warrants reclassification into separate species.

Léia Cecilia de Lima Fávaro, Fernando Lucas de Melo, Carlos Ivan Aguilar-Vildoso, Welington Luiz Araújo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of the Effects ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic Diversity ofMycobiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Plant-Fungal Interactions: A Case Study ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Studies in mycology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Léia Cecilia de Lima FávaroEmpraba Agroenergia, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Fernando Lucas de Melo
Carlos Ivan Aguilar-Vildoso
Welington Luiz Araújo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpicoccum nigrum Link (syn. E. purpurascens Ehrenb. ex Schlecht) is a saprophytic ascomycete distributed worldwide which colonizes a myriad of substrates. This fungus has been known as a biological control agent for plant pathogens and produces a variety of secondary metabolites with important biological activities as well as biotechnological application. E. nigrum produces darkly pigmented muriform conidia on short conidiophores on sporodochia and is a genotypically and phenotypically highly variable species. Since different isolates identified as E. nigrum have been evaluated as biological control agents and used for biocompound production, it is highly desirable that this species name refers to only one lineage. However, according to morphological and genetic variation, E. nigrum present two genotypes that may comprise more than one species. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe report the application of combined molecular (ITS and β-tubulin gene sequence analysis, PCR-RFLP and AFLP techniques), morphometric, physiological, genetic compatibility and recombination analysis to study the taxonomic relationships within an endophytic population that has been identified as E. nigrum. This combined analysis established two genotypes showing morphological, physiological and genetic divergence as well as genetic incompatibility characterized by colony inhibition, strongly indicating that these genotypes correspond to different species. Genotype 1 corresponds to E. nigrum while genotype 2 represents a new species, referred to in this study as Epicoccum sp. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This research contributes to the knowledge of the Epicoccum genus and asserts that the classification of E. nigrum as a single variable species should be reassessed. In fact, based on the polyphasic approach we suggest the occurrence of cryptic species within E. nigrum and also that many of the sequences deposited as E. nigrum in GenBank and culture collection of microbial strains should be reclassified, including the reference strain CBS 161.73 sequenced in this work. In addition, this study provides valuable tools for differentiation of Epicoccum species.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisAscomycotaBase SequenceBayes TheoremColony Count, MicrobialDNA FingerprintingDNA, IntergenicFungal ProteinsMutant ProteinsMyceliumPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRecombination, GeneticSpecies SpecificityDNA, IntergenicFungal ProteinsMutant ProteinsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID21853017
PMCPMC3154903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.