ArticleBMJ case reports2009
A case of rapid-growing anaplastic meningiomas.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risks and neurological benefits of meningioma surgery in elderly patients compared to young patients.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
- Extensive growth of an anaplastic meningioma.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningiomas are tumours originating from the leptomeningeal covering of the brain and spinal cord and are generally benign and slow growing. Rarely, they show malignant anaplastic characteristics with a high recurrence rate. A number of factors have been reported to predict this high recurrence. Such factors are histopathological ones, such as necrosis and hypercellularity, the World Health Organization (WHO) grade, mitotic index, positivity of proliferation markers (Ki-67 or MIB-1), clinical parameters such as age, gender, localisation, cytogenetic factors and radiation treatment. The present case reports a patient with a giant meningioma over the right frontal lobe who had almost all possible negative prognostic parameters and showed an explosive multifocal recurrence in a timespan of about 5 months.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.