ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2011
Characterization of a high-purity germanium detector for small-animal SPECT.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of high-purity germanium detectors and gamma-ray water monitors in radioactive wastewater management for targeted radionuclide therapy.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in the Application of Perovskite Materials.Nano-micro letters · 2023Review
- Molecular Breast Imaging using Synthetic Projections from High-Purity Germanium Detectors: A Simulation Study.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2017Article
- Development of a Germanium Small-Animal SPECT System.IEEE transactions on nuclear science · 2015Article
- Simulation study comparing high-purity germanium and cadmium zinc telluride detectors for breast imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2014Article
- Advances in preclinical SPECT instrumentation.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present an initial evaluation of a mechanically cooled, high-purity germanium double-sided strip detector as a potential gamma camera for small-animal SPECT. It is 90 mm in diameter and 10 mm thick with two sets of 16 orthogonal strips that have a 4.5 mm width with a 5 mm pitch. We found an energy resolution of 0.96% at 140 keV, an intrinsic efficiency of 43.3% at 122 keV and a FWHM spatial resolution of approximately 1.5 mm. We demonstrated depth-of-interaction estimation capability through comparison of pinhole acquisitions with a point source on and off axes. Finally, a flood-corrected flood image exhibited a strip-level uniformity of less than 1%. This high-purity germanium offers many desirable properties for small-animal SPECT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.