Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21852653›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2011

The wrong tool for the job: diabetes public health programs and practice guidelines.

Urmimala Sarkar, Andrea López, Karen Black, Dean Schillinger

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Urmimala SarkarDivision of General Internal Medicine and Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1364, USA. usarkar@medsfgh.ucsf.edu
Andrea López
Karen Black
Dean Schillinger

Funding

CTSA: K12 COMPONENTKL2RR024130 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$19.3M
Interactive HIT to Promote Ambulatory Safety among Vulnerable Diabetes PatientsK08HS017594 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2008 to 2012
$685k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS017594NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024130NCRR NIH HHS KL2RR024130PHS HHS ULRR024131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We surveyed state diabetes programs to determine whether they develop and disseminate diabetes guidelines. We found they largely disseminate clinical practice guidelines developed from subspecialty organizations, do not prioritize among the many recommendations contained in diabetes guidelines, and have not adapted guidelines to focus on population rather than individual health. An opportunity exists for state diabetes control programs to better align guidelines with public health goals.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicPublic HealthCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes MellitusHealth Care SurveysHumansSocieties, MedicalState Government

Identifiers

PMID21852653
PMCPMC3222377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.