ArticleGenome research2011
High-throughput semiquantitative analysis of insertional mutations in heterogeneous tumors.
Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct shared and compartment-enriched oncogenic networks drive primary versus metastatic breast cancer.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Forward and Reverse Genetics of B Cell Malignancies: From Insertional Mutagenesis to CRISPR-Cas.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- In vivo functional screening for systems-level integrative cancer genomics.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2020Review
- CRISPR and transposon in vivo screens for cancer drivers and therapeutic targets.Genome biology · 2020Review
- LUMI-PCR: an Illumina platform ligation-mediated PCR protocol for integration site cloning, provides molecular quantitation of integration sites.Mobile DNA · 2020Article
- Sleeping Beauty Mouse Models of Cancer: Microenvironmental Influences on Cancer Genetics.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Subclonal mutation selection in mouse lymphomagenesis identifies known cancer loci and suggests novel candidates.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Insertional mutagenesis in a HER2-positive breast cancer model reveals ERAS as a driver of cancer and therapy resistance.Oncogene · 2018Article
- Transposons As Tools for Functional Genomics in Vertebrate Models.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2017Review
- Insertional mutagenesis identifies drivers of a novel oncogenic pathway in invasive lobular breast carcinoma.Nature genetics · 2017Article
- Identifying transposon insertions and their effects from RNA-sequencing data.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Genome-wide transposon screening and quantitative insertion site sequencing for cancer gene discovery in mice.Nature protocols · 2017Article
- Analyzing tumor heterogeneity and driver genes in single myeloid leukemia cells with SBCapSeq.Nature biotechnology · 2016Article
- RNA sequencing of Sleeping Beauty transposon-induced tumors detects transposon-RNA fusions in forward genetic cancer screens.Genome research · 2016Article
- Lessons Learned from Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus in Animal Models.ILAR journal · 2016Article
- The utility of transposon mutagenesis for cancer studies in the era of genome editing.Genome biology · 2015Review
- Quantitative shearing linear amplification polymerase chain reaction: an improved method for quantifying lentiviral vector insertion sites in transplanted hematopoietic cell systems.Human gene therapy methods · 2015Article
- Sequencing methods and datasets to improve functional interpretation of sleeping beauty mutagenesis screens.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Targeted sequencing by proximity ligation for comprehensive variant detection and local haplotyping.Nature biotechnology · 2014Article
- Novel principles of gamma-retroviral insertional transcription activation in murine leukemia virus-induced end-stage tumors.Retrovirology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Retroviral and transposon-based insertional mutagenesis (IM) screens are widely used for cancer gene discovery in mice. Exploiting the full potential of IM screens requires methods for high-throughput sequencing and mapping of transposon and retroviral insertion sites. Current protocols are based on ligation-mediated PCR amplification of junction fragments from restriction endonuclease-digested genomic DNA, resulting in amplification biases due to uneven genomic distribution of restriction enzyme recognition sites. Consequently, sequence coverage cannot be used to assess the clonality of individual insertions. We have developed a novel method, called shear-splink, for the semiquantitative high-throughput analysis of insertional mutations. Shear-splink employs random fragmentation of genomic DNA, which reduces unwanted amplification biases. Additionally, shear-splink enables us to assess clonality of individual insertions by determining the number of unique ligation points (LPs) between the adapter and genomic DNA. This parameter serves as a semiquantitative measure of the relative clonality of individual insertions within heterogeneous tumors. Mixing experiments with clonal cell lines derived from mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-induced tumors showed that shear-splink enables the semiquantitative assessment of the clonality of MMTV insertions. Further, shear-splink analysis of 16 MMTV- and 127 Sleeping Beauty (SB)-induced tumors showed enrichment for cancer-relevant insertions by exclusion of irrelevant background insertions marked by single LPs, thereby facilitating the discovery of candidate cancer genes. To fully exploit the use of the shear-splink method, we set up the Insertional Mutagenesis Database (iMDB), offering a publicly available web-based application to analyze both retroviral- and transposon-based insertional mutagenesis data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.