Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21850562›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2011

Evaluation and imaging of an untreated grade III hamstring tear: a case report.

Brett B Clark, David Jaffe, R Frank Henn, Richard M Lovering

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Return to sport after muscle injury.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Total proximal hamstring ruptures: clinical and MRI aspects including guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brett B ClarkDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 100 Penn St, AHB, Rm 540, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
David Jaffe
R Frank Henn
Richard M Lovering
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Force Loss in Injured and Dystrophic Skeletal MuscleR01AR059179 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LOVERING, RICHARD M · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
The Role of Intermediate Filaments in Skeletal Muscle Injury and DiseaseK01AR053235 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LOVERING, RICHARD M · 2007 to 2011
$654k
NIAMS NIH HHS 1R01AR059179NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR053235NIAMS NIH HHS K01AR053235NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle strains are one of the most common complaints treated by physicians. High-force lengthening contractions can produce very high forces resulting in pain and tissue damage; such strains are the most common cause of muscle injuries. The hamstring muscles are particularly susceptible as they cross two joints and regularly perform lengthening contractions during running. We describe a patient with return to full function after a large hamstring tear. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report the case of a 26-year-old man who presented 1 year after a noncontact, left-sided proximal hamstring tear incurred while sprinting. He received no medical treatment or formal rehabilitation. He was able to return to all sports and activities 1 to 2 months after injury, but noted a persistent deformity of the proximal thigh, which led him to seek evaluation. Physical examination, MRI functional tests, and specific muscle tests 1 year after his injury documented a major hamstring tear at the musculotendinous junction with muscle retraction, but no avulsion of the proximal tendon attachment. LITERATURE REVIEW: Surgery often is recommended for major proximal hamstring tendon tears, especially when more than one tendon of origin is ruptured from the ischial tuberosity. Myotendinous tears are treated nonoperatively, but may be associated with decreased strength, prolonged recovery, and recurrence. PURPOSE AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We describe the case of a young man who sustained a hamstring tear, with retraction, at the proximal myotendinous junction, where the biceps femoris and semitendinosus arise from the conjoint tendon. He achieved full functional recovery without medical attention, but had a persistent cosmetic deformity and slight hamstring tightness. This case suggests a benign natural history for this injury and the appropriateness of noninvasive treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAthletic InjuriesHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularSprains and StrainsTendon Injuries

Identifiers

PMID21850562
PMCPMC3183192
OpenAlexW1991676219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.