Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21850536›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2012

Is there a role for high dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell rescue in patients with relapsed supratentorial PNET?

C P Raghuram, L Moreno, S Zacharoulis

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C P RaghuramChildren and Young People's Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK.
L Moreno
S Zacharoulis
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors (sPNET) are rare childhood brain tumors. There is no standard strategy for treating relapsed sPNETs. The role of high dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell rescue (HDC with HSCR) in treating relapsed sPNET is controversial. A systematic review of the literature regarding outcome of patients with relapsed sPNET treated with HDC and HSCR was performed to examine the potential predictive factors that would justify its use in this subset of patients. Forty-six patients were identified fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Of those, 15 patients were infants and 15 were pineoblastomas. With a median follow-up of 40 months (range 3-123 months) 15 patients were reported alive. Thirteen patients out of the 15 survivors did not receive craniospinal irradiation (CSRT). The 12 month overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 44.2 ± 7.5 months. Twelve-month OS for children less than 36 months was 66.7 ± 12.2 months while for older children it was 27.8 ± 10.6 (P = 0.003). Twelve-month OS was 20.0 ± 10.3 for those patients with pineoblastoma versus 54.6 ± 9.0 for those with non-pineal sPNETs (P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed pineal location as the only independent adverse prognostic factor. In conclusion high dose chemotherapy with HSCR might lead to survival primarily in younger children with relapsed sPNET even in the absence of concomitant use of radiotherapy, whereas the outcome in older children and/or in pineal location is extremely poor with this modality.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyDatabases, BibliographicDrug TherapyFollow-Up StudiesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansNeuroectodermal TumorsProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSupratentorial NeoplasmsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID21850536
OpenAlexW1977271856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.