Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21850456›Full record

ReviewPlanta2011

Piecing together the puzzle of parasitic plant plastome evolution.

Kirsten Krause

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative chloroplast genome analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The First Plastid Genome of the Holoparasitic GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Principles of plastid reductive evolution illuminated by nonphotosynthetic chrysophytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The complete chloroplast genome of hemi-parasiticMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kirsten KrauseDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. kirsten.krause@uit.no

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of photosynthesis as a mode of energy production has put plastid genomes of plants under a constant purifying selection. This has shaped the characteristic features of plastid genomes across the entire spectrum of photosynthetic plants and has led to a highly uniform and conserved plastid genome with respect to structure, size, gene order, intron and editing site positions and coding capacity. Parasitic species that have dropped photosynthesis as the main energy provider share striking deviations from the plastid genome norm: multiple rearrangements within the circular chromosome, pseudogenization and gene deletions, promoter losses, intron losses as well as the extensive loss of mRNA editing competence have been reported. The collective loss of larger sets of functionally related genes like those for the plastid NADH-dehydrogenase complex and concomitant losses of RNA polymerase genes together with their target promoters point to "domino effects" where an initial loss might have triggered others. An example, which will be discussed in more detail, is the concomitant loss of the intron maturase gene matK and all introns that are supposedly subject to MatK-dependent splicing in two Cuscuta species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChromosomes, PlantCuscutaGenes, PlantGenetic StructuresGenome, PlastidIntronsPhotosynthesisPhylogenyPlant Physiological PhenomenaPlantsPlastidsPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA EditingRNA SplicingSequence Deletion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.