Trial reportUrological research2012
Initial experience with a newly developed antirefluxive ureter stent.
Trial report in Urological research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does an anti-reflux ureteral stent offer real benefits for children after endoscopic surgery for upper urinary tract stones? A single-center randomized controlled trial.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Foley catheter after ureteroscopy and JJ stent placement: a randomised prospective European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis-Young Academic Urologists (EULIS-YAU) endourology study.BJU international · 2025Trial
- Triangular prismatic JJ stent does not cause more discomfort than tubular ones: a randomised controlled trial comparison.World journal of urology · 2024Trial
- Combination therapy only shows short-term superiority over monotherapy on ureteral stent-related symptoms - outcome from a randomized controlled trial.BMC urology · 2016Trial
- Editorial: future of ureteral stents: what do we need? a pearls opinion.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Antireflux Ureteral Stents Prevent Stent-Related Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Cureus · 2023Review
- 3D-Printing-Assisted Extraluminal Anti-Reflux Diodes for Preventing Vesicoureteral Reflux through Double-J Stents.International journal of bioprinting · 2022Article
- Study to Enhance Understanding of Stent-Associated Symptoms: Rationale and Study Design.Journal of endourology · 2021Observational
- Ureteral stents in urolithiasis.Asian journal of urology · 2018Review
- Is intravesical stent position a predictor of associated morbidity?Korean journal of urology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the functional efficacy of newly developed antirefluxive ureter stents (DJ), by performing immediate post-stenting cystograms on patients with acute ureteral obstruction requiring a DJ stent, and assessing stent-related symptoms by means of ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ). Patients with acute hydronephrosis requiring internal drainage were randomized to receive either an antirefluxive DJ or a conventional DJ (7 Fr., 26 cm, polyurethane, Urovision(®), Germany). Mean stone size was 6.64 ± 3.33 and 6.5 ± 3.54 mm. Immediately after correct placement of the DJ, 200 ml of diluted contrast media was introduced into the bladder under fluoroscopic control to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Patients completed German versions of the USSQ on days 2 and 7 following stent placement, and 1 week after stent removal. The results were analyzed. 13 conventional and 16 antirefluxive stents were placed in 29 patients. Reflux was documented in eight conventionally stented patients (62.5%). Two of the 16 patients with antirefluxive stents (22%) presented reflux. 1 week after stent implantation, the mean pain value was 1.1 in the antirefluxive group and 3 in the standard group (p < 0.062). Flank pain during micturition occurred after 2 days in seven patients (58%) with standard stents and in three patients (33%) with antirefluxive stents (p < 0.23). 1 week after stent insertion, flank pain had dropped to 40% in the standard group and 11% in the antirefluxive group (p < 0.3). Our initial experience showed that the antirefluxive system might be effective in terms of reflux prevention and reduction of stent related symptoms especially during sexual intercourse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21850408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.