Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21850408›Full record

Trial reportUrological research2012

Initial experience with a newly developed antirefluxive ureter stent.

Manuel Ritter, Patrick Krombach, Thomas Knoll, Maurice Stephan Michel, Axel Haecker

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Urological research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Ureteral stents in urolithiasis.Asian journal of urology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manuel RitterDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135 Mannheim, Germany. manuel.ritter@umm.de
Patrick Krombach
Thomas Knoll
Maurice Stephan Michel
Axel Haecker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the functional efficacy of newly developed antirefluxive ureter stents (DJ), by performing immediate post-stenting cystograms on patients with acute ureteral obstruction requiring a DJ stent, and assessing stent-related symptoms by means of ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ). Patients with acute hydronephrosis requiring internal drainage were randomized to receive either an antirefluxive DJ or a conventional DJ (7 Fr., 26 cm, polyurethane, Urovision(®), Germany). Mean stone size was 6.64 ± 3.33 and 6.5 ± 3.54 mm. Immediately after correct placement of the DJ, 200 ml of diluted contrast media was introduced into the bladder under fluoroscopic control to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Patients completed German versions of the USSQ on days 2 and 7 following stent placement, and 1 week after stent removal. The results were analyzed. 13 conventional and 16 antirefluxive stents were placed in 29 patients. Reflux was documented in eight conventionally stented patients (62.5%). Two of the 16 patients with antirefluxive stents (22%) presented reflux. 1 week after stent implantation, the mean pain value was 1.1 in the antirefluxive group and 3 in the standard group (p < 0.062). Flank pain during micturition occurred after 2 days in seven patients (58%) with standard stents and in three patients (33%) with antirefluxive stents (p < 0.23). 1 week after stent insertion, flank pain had dropped to 40% in the standard group and 11% in the antirefluxive group (p < 0.3). Our initial experience showed that the antirefluxive system might be effective in terms of reflux prevention and reduction of stent related symptoms especially during sexual intercourse.

Indexed as

StentsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUreteral ObstructionVesico-Ureteral Reflux

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.