Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21850186›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2011

A comparison of stem cell-related gene expression in the progenitor-rich limbal epithelium and the differentiating central corneal epithelium.

Teresa Nieto-Miguel, Margarita Calonge, Ana de la Mata, Marina López-Paniagua, Sara Galindo, María Fideliz de la Paz, Rosa M Corrales

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03884569 (Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03884569 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation (CLET) for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency (LSCD): an Observational Study on Safety and Effectiveness

TypeobservationalSponsorInstituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (Institute of Applied Ophthalmobiology) - IOBARan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsLimbal Stem-cell Deficiency
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Improving iPSC Differentiation Using a Nanodot Platform.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Establishment of an in vitro monolayer model of macular corneal dystrophy.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2016
    Article
  17. A Case of Solitary Nonvascularized Corneal Epithelial Dysplasia.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teresa Nieto-MiguelInstitute for Applied Ophthalmobiology (IOBA), University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. tnietom@ioba.med.uva.es
Margarita Calonge
Ana de la Mata
Marina López-Paniagua
Sara Galindo
María Fideliz de la Paz
Rosa M Corrales

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCorneal epithelium is maintained by a population of stem cells (SCs) that have not been identified by specific molecular markers. The objective of this study was to find new putative markers for these SCs and to identify associated molecular pathways.

methodsReal time PCR (rt-PCR) was performed in 24 human limbal and central corneal epithelial samples to evaluate the gene expression profile of known corneal epithelial SC-associated markers. A pool of those samples was further analyzed by a rt-PCR array (RT²-PCR-A) for 84 genes related to the identification, growth, maintenance, and differentiation of SCs.

resultsCells from the corneal epithelium SC niche showed significant expression of ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2 (ABCG2) and cytokeratin (KRT)15, KRT14, and KRT5 genes. RT²-PCR-A results indicated an increased or decreased expression in 21 and 24 genes, respectively, in cells from the corneal SC niche compared to cells from the central corneal epithelium. Functional analysis by proprietary software found 4 different associated pathways and a novel network with the highest upregulated genes in the corneal SC niche. This led to the identification of specific molecules, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12 (CXCL12), islet-1 transcription factor LIM/homeodomain (ISL1), collagen-type II alpha 1 (COL2A), neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (NCAM1), aggrecan (ACAN), forkhead box A2 (FOXA2), Gap junction protein beta 1/connexin 32 (GJB1/Cnx32), and Msh homeobox 1 (MSX1), that could be used to recognize putative corneal epithelial SCs grown in culture and intended for transplantation. Other molecules, NCAM1 and GJB1/Cnx32, potentially could be used to positively purify them, and Par-6 partitioning defective 6 homolog alpha (PARD6A) to negatively purify them.

conclusionsKnowledge of these gene and molecular pathways has provided a better understanding of the signaling molecular pathways associated with progenitor-rich limbal epithelium. This knowledge potentially could give support to the design and development of innovative therapies with the potential to reverse corneal blindness arising from ocular surface failure.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGene Regulatory NetworksATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2AutopsyBiomarkersCell DifferentiationEpithelium, CornealGene Expression ProfilingHumansKeratin-14Keratin-15Keratin-5Limbus CorneaeNeoplasm ProteinsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionABCG2 protein, humanATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2BiomarkersKeratin-14Keratin-15Keratin-5Neoplasm ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID21850186
PMCPMC3156782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.