Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21850041›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2011

Learning about human population history from ancient and modern genomes.

Mark Stoneking, Johannes Krause

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Humans 40,000 y ago developed a system of conventional signs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Editor's view: What makes science successful?Journal of global health · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Isotopic evidence for human mobility in late antique Bulla Regia (Tunisia).Journal of archaeological science, reports · 2023
    Article
  10. Optimization of the "Ecology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. InnovativeFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fostering Responsible Research on Ancient DNA.American journal of human genetics · 2020
    Review
  20. Integration of ancient DNA with transdisciplinary dataset finds strong support for Inca resettlement in the south Peruvian coast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark StonekingDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, D04103 Leipzig, Germany. stoneking@eva.mpg.de
Johannes Krause

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide data, both from SNP arrays and from complete genome sequencing, are becoming increasingly abundant and are now even available from extinct hominins. These data are providing new insights into population history; in particular, when combined with model-based analytical approaches, genome-wide data allow direct testing of hypotheses about population history. For example, genome-wide data from both contemporary populations and extinct hominins strongly support a single dispersal of modern humans from Africa, followed by two archaic admixture events: one with Neanderthals somewhere outside Africa and a second with Denisovans that (so far) has only been detected in New Guinea. These new developments promise to reveal new stories about human population history, without having to resort to storytelling.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanAfricaAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome MappingFossilsGenetic Association StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHominidaeHumansMolecular Sequence DataNew GuineaPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation GroupsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID21850041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.