Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21849288›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2011

Natural cholera infection-derived immunity in an endemic setting.

Mohammad Ali, Michael Emch, Jin Kyung Park, Mohammad Yunus, John Clemens

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-Term Kinetics of Serological Antibodies againstInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. InactivatedJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  17. Cholera Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2022.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammad AliInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea. mali@ivi.int
Michael Emch
Jin Kyung Park
Mohammad Yunus
John Clemens
International Vaccine Institute · KRInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Integration of Spatial and Social Network Analysis in Vaccine TrialsR03AI076748 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EMCH, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2010
$147k
NIAID NIH HHS R03-AI076748NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLive oral cholera vaccines may protect against cholera in a manner similar to natural cholera infections. However, information on which to base these vaccines is limited.

methodsThe study was conducted in a cholera-endemic population in Bangladesh. Patients with cholera (index patients) detected between 1991 and 2000 were age-matched to 4 cholera-free controls and then followed up during the subsequent 3 years.

resultsEl Tor cholera was associated with a 65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37%-81%; P < .001) lower risk of a subsequent El Tor episode. Reduction of the risk of subsequent El Tor cholera was similar for children < 5 years and for older persons and was sustained during all 3 years of follow-up. Having El Tor Inaba cholera was associated with lower risks of both El Tor Inaba and El Tor Ogawa cholera, but having El Tor Ogawa cholera was associated only with a reduced risk of El Tor Ogawa cholera. O139 cholera was associated with a 63% (95% CI, -61% to 92%; P = .18) lower risk of subsequent O139 cholera, but there was no evidence of cross-protection between the O1 and O139 serogroups.

conclusionsLive oral cholera vaccines designed to protect against the O1 and O139 serogroups should contain at least the Inaba serotype and strains of both serogroups.

Indexed as

Endemic DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBangladeshChildChild, PreschoolCholeraCholera VaccinesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedCholera Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21849288
PMCPMC3156915
OpenAlexW2166635834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.