Trial reportPediatric diabetes2012
GAD autoantibody epitope pattern after GAD-alum treatment in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Trial report in Pediatric diabetes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics of in-vitro phenotypes of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibodies in high-titre individuals.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2013Trial
- GAD65Abs Are Not Associated With Beta-Cell Dysfunction in Patients With T2D in the GRADE Study.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2024 · on this mapArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsWe have previously shown that two injections of glutamic acid decarboxylase formulated in alum (GAD-alum) preserved residual insulin secretion in children and adolescents with recent onset type 1 diabetes (T1D), and was accompanied by increased GAD autoantibody (GADA) titers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether GAD-alum treatment affected the GADA epitope pattern.
methodsSerum samples from patients treated with GAD-alum (n = 33) or placebo (n = 27), at baseline, 1, 3, 9, and 15 months after the initial injection, were tested for their binding capacity to specific GADA epitopes in an epitope-specific radioligand binding assay with six recombinant Fab (rFab) (b96.11, DPA, DPD, MICA3, b78, and N-GAD(65) mAb).
resultsNo significant differences in variability of binding to any of the tested rFab were observed from baseline to 15 months. There was a sustained low binding of GADA to the b78- and N-GAD(65) mAb-defined epitopes, often recognized by GADA in patients with stiff person syndrome (SPS) and seldom in T1D patients. However, binding of GADA to the T1D-associated b96.11-defined epitope increased between baseline and 3 months in GAD-alum (-8.1%, min -72.4%, max 39.6%) compared to placebo patients (1.5%, min -28.3%, max 28.6%) (p = 0.02). Subsequently, the b96.11-defined epitope recognition returned to levels similar to that observed at baseline.
conclusionsGAD-alum injections did not affect binding of GADA to SPS-related epitopes, further supporting the safety of the treatment. There were no changes in GADA epitope specificity to the T1D-related epitopes, except for a temporarily increased binding to one of the tested epitopes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.