Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21848333›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2011

Deconvolution of chemical mixtures with high complexity by NMR consensus trace clustering.

Kerem Bingol, Rafael Brüschweiler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Can NMR solve some significant challenges in metabolomics?Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kerem BingolInstitute of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry and National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA.
Rafael Brüschweiler

Funding

New hybrid methods for the improved and integrated analysis of complex metabolomics mixturesR01GM066041 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRUSCHWEILER, RAFAEL · 2002 to 2019
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification and quantification of analytes in complex solution-state mixtures are critical procedures in many areas of chemistry, biology, and molecular medicine. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a unique tool for this purpose providing a wealth of atomic-detail information without requiring extensive fractionation of the samples. We present three new multidimensional-NMR based approaches that are geared toward the analysis of mixtures with high complexity at natural (13)C abundance, including approaches that are encountered in metabolomics. Common to all three approaches is the concept of the extraction of one-dimensional (1D) consensus spectral traces or 2D consensus planes followed by clustering, which significantly improves the capability to identify mixture components that are affected by strong spectral overlap. The methods are demonstrated for covariance (1)H-(1)H TOCSY and (13)C-(1)H HSQC-TOCSY spectra and triple-rank correlation spectra constructed from pairs of (13)C-(1)H HSQC and (13)C-(1)H HSQC-TOCSY spectra. All methods are first demonstrated for an eight-compound metabolite model mixture before being applied to an extract from E. coli cell lysate.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino AcidsComputer SimulationEscherichia coliNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularNucleic AcidsAmino AcidsNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID21848333
PMCPMC3244875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.