ReviewDer Radiologe2011
[Malignant focal liver lesions].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Oncologic imaging: indications for and limitations of modern cross-sectional imaging techniques].Der Radiologe · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focal liver lesions are a very common occurrence. The detection and differentiation of such lesions is particularly important for the management of oncology patients and is a core task for radiology. The early and conclusive detection of malignant liver processes in a cost-efficient manner and with a low radiation dose for the patient requires systematic and skillful use of the various radiological methods. This review explains the application of current radiological methods for the detection and differentiation of malignant liver lesions and the typical appearance of the most commonly found liver malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21847779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.