ReviewPediatric radiology2011
Newer CT applications and their alternatives: what is appropriate in children?
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography for renal artery stenosis in children.Pediatric radiology · 2021Article
- Differential diagnosis of perinatal hypophosphatasia: radiologic perspectives.Pediatric radiology · 2019Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-dimensional Turbo Field Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequence in Pediatric Tracheobronchial Anomalies with Congenital Heart Disease.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Imaging in the diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis.Pediatric radiology · 2017Review
- Revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Staging System.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015Article
- Nationwide radiation dose survey of computed tomography for fetal skeletal dysplasias.Pediatric radiology · 2014Article
- Craniosynostosis: imaging review and primer on computed tomography.Pediatric radiology · 2013Review
- Cardiovascular CT angiography in neonates and children: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction with iterative image reconstruction techniques.European radiology · 2013Article
- Noninvasive imaging in children with hypertension.Pediatric radiology · 2013Article
- Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: are we over-scanning our patients?Pediatric hematology and oncology · 2012Article
- Prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasia with 3D CT.Pediatric radiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Innovations in image acquisition and reconstruction technologies have greatly expanded the range of CT applications available in the routine clinical setting. CT images of sub-millimeter resolution can now be acquired of entire body regions in a few seconds or even sub-second time, allowing depiction of fine anatomical detail uncompromised by motion artifact. With sophisticated visualization software, image data can be processed into multiplanar, volume-rendered, cine and other formats to better display anatomical abnormalities and facilitate newer applications such as CT angiography, enterography, urography, tracheobronchography and cardiac CT. Newer applications including dual-energy material decomposition CT are furthering the transition of CT from a purely morphological to a combined anatomical, functional and metabolic imaging technique. These newer applications have largely been pioneered in adult populations, and heightened concern of the risk of carcinogenesis from ionizing radiation tempers dissemination of their use in children. Similar information can often be gleaned from alternative imaging modalities without ionizing radiation exposure, such as MRI and US, and what is most appropriate in children will depend on relative diagnostic efficacy, cost, availability and local expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.