Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21847623›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2011

Pancreatic injury in 284 patients with severe abdominal trauma: outcome, course, and treatment algorithm.

Matthias Heuer, Björn Hussmann, Rolf Lefering, Georg Taeger, Gernot M Kaiser, Andreas Paul, Sven Lendemans, Trauma Registry of the DGU

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mortality patterns and postoperative outcomes of trauma-induced pancreatic resections: A pilot study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Tumorous lesion of the pancreas with unclear dignity].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Approach to liver, spleen and pancreatic injuries including damage control surgery of terrorist attacks].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthias HeuerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, NRW, Germany.
Björn Hussmann
Rolf Lefering
Georg Taeger
Gernot M Kaiser
Andreas Paul
Sven Lendemans
Trauma Registry of the DGU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe relevance of pancreatic trauma in severely injured patients within a large collective has not been thoroughly analyzed yet. This study aimed at assessing the prevalence of pancreatic trauma in relation to the outcome and the currently established algorithm of treatment.

methodsSome 51,425 patients from the Trauma Register of the German Society of Trauma Surgery (TR DGU) (1993-2009) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients with an "injury severity score" ≥16, direct admission to a trauma center and subsequent treatment for at least 3 days, age ≥16, and an abdominal injury [abbreviated injury scale (AIS)(abdomen) ≥2] were included. Patients with abdominal trauma (AIS(abdomen) ≥2) were compared with patients with an additional pancreatic trauma (AIS(pancreas) 2-5).

resultsOf 51,425 patients, 9,268 (18%) had documented abdominal injuries. Two hundred eighty-four (3.1%) patients with abdominal injury additionally showed a pancreatic injury (AIS(abdomen) ≥2, AIS(pancreas) 2-5) and were analyzed in dependency of the classification of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) organ severity score. AAST-pancreas: II°, 1.9%; III°, 0.6%; IV°, 0.3%; and V°, 0.2%. Patients with leading pancreatic injury (grades IV and V) thereby showed a significant increase of mortality (IV°, 30.0% and V°, 33.3%) and an increase of the need for surgical intervention (IV°, 80.6% and V°: 81.8%).

conclusionsThe results presented here show the prevalence and the outcome of pancreas injury in a large collective within the TR DGU for the first time. Based on the current literature and the findings, a treatment algorithm has been developed.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathAbdominal InjuriesAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood TransfusionCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedMultiple TraumaPancreasPancreatectomyAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.