Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21847545›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2012

Comparison between quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularization by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and results of histopathological scoring in ulcerative colitis.

Christiane Girlich, Doris Schacherer, Ernst Michael Jung, Frank Klebl, Elisabeth Huber

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christiane GirlichDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. christiane.girlich@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
Doris Schacherer
Ernst Michael Jung
Frank Klebl
Elisabeth Huber
University of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn ulcerative colitis (UC), endoscopic methods are preferred for assessment of extent and activity of disease. Due to the invasive nature of endoscopical examinations, replacement by other, reliable imaging procedures would be helpful. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in combination with perfusion assessment using a specific quantification software might be such a new diagnostic tool. Thus, we compared the findings of CEUS with the results of endoscopically taken specimens applying a histopathological scoring system.

methodsWe prospectively evaluated 15 patients with proven UC undergoing endoscopy. CEUS was performed and the quantification software Qontrast® applied to obtain contrast-enhanced sonographic perfusion maps. Moreover, in each patient C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured and taken biopsies were assessed using an advanced scoring system. Four patients had to be excluded from final analysis.

resultsThere was a trend to higher Peak (%) values with increasing histological inflammation. Furthermore, a strong negative correlation between the ratio TTP (s)/Peak (%) (Spearman's correlation r = -0.761, p < 0.01) was found. There was no significant relationship between CRP and histopathological scoring or CEUS parameters, respectively.

conclusionQuantitative evaluation with CEUS, particularly the calculation of the ratio TTP (s)/Peak (%), provides a simple method for assessment of inflammatory activity in UC.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaAdultColitis, UlcerativeColonFemaleHumansMaleUltrasonographyContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID21847545
OpenAlexW2044803971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.