Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21847517›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2012

Functional outcomes of sleep in Thai patients with obstructive sleep-disordered breathing.

Wish Banhiran, Paraya Assanasen, Choakchai Metheetrairut, Cherdchai Nopmaneejumruslers, Wattanachai Chotinaiwattarakul, Jeerapa Kerdnoppakhun

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wish BanhiranThe Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. wishbanh@gmail.com
Paraya Assanasen
Choakchai Metheetrairut
Cherdchai Nopmaneejumruslers
Wattanachai Chotinaiwattarakul
Jeerapa Kerdnoppakhun

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesQuality of life assessment in obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (OSDB) is increasingly recognized, and the functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire (FOSQ) is a popular instrument. The objective of this study was to apply this questionnaire in Thai patients to assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness properties.

methodsA total of 223 subjects were recruited. The scores of FOSQ in 38 healthy volunteers and 40 primary snorers were compared with those of 108 obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients diagnosed by polysomnography. Seventy-two subjects answered the FOSQ twice at 2-4 weeks apart to check the test-retest reliability, and 37 patients with OSA who complied well with CPAP therapy answered them again after treatment at 3-6 months. All participants also filled the Epworth sleepiness scales (ESS) to check the concurrent validity.

resultsThere were statistically significant differences in all FOSQ subscales including global scores between healthy volunteers (17.3 ± 2.1) and OSA patients (14.5 ± 2.9) (p < 0.001). The internal consistency of the questionnaire was excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.95), and the test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients) was 0.70 in global scores. After adequate CPAP therapy, all FOSQ scores increased significantly (p < 0.001) There were significant correlations between all FOSQ scores except sexual relationship and ESS (r -0.48); however, these had only a weak relationship with AHI and minimal oxygen saturation.

conclusionsThe FOSQ can be applied to Thai patients with OSDB with good reliability, validity, and responsiveness properties. It may be the first validated version of FOSQ in East Asian countries which is a very useful tool for future research.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSnoringThailand

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.