ReviewPlant signaling & behavior2011
Antimicrobial peptides: modes of mechanism, modulation of defense responses.
Review in Plant signaling & behavior, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Action of Antimicrobial Peptides and Antibiotics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Design and Characterization of Antibacterial Peptide Nanofibrils as Components of Composites for Biomaterial Applications.Current protein & peptide science · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial peptides in Dendrobium officinale: Genomic parameters, peptide structures, and gene expression patterns.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Nanomedicine for drug resistant pathogens and COVID-19 using mushroom nanocomposite inspired with bacteriocin - A review.Inorganic chemistry communications · 2023Review
- The Role of the Two-Component System PhoP/PhoQ in Intrinsic Resistance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Short Peptides Make a Big Difference: The Role of Botany-Derived AMPs in Disease Control and Protection of Human Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Silver Nanoparticles Functionalized With Antimicrobial Polypeptides: Benefits and Possible Pitfalls of a Novel Anti-infective Tool.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Antimicrobial Peptides: A New Hope in Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Fields.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
- Evaluation of Nisin and LL-37 Antimicrobial Peptides as Tool to Preserve Articular Cartilage Healing in a Septic Environment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Expression and Roles of Antimicrobial Peptides in Innate Defense of Airway Mucosa: Potential Implication in Cystic Fibrosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Proline-Rich Antimicrobial Peptides in Medicinal Maggots ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Recent Advances in the Use ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Proteomics assisted profiling of antimicrobial peptide signatures from black pepper (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2018Article
- Antibacterial Peptides in Dermatology-Strategies for Evaluation of Allergic Potential.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- SP-LL-37, human antimicrobial peptide, enhances disease resistance in transgenic rice.PloS one · 2017Article
- Insect antimicrobial peptides: potential tools for the prevention of skin cancer.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2016Review
- Insect antimicrobial peptides act synergistically to inhibit a trypanosome parasite.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Antimicrobial combinations: Bliss independence and Loewe additivity derived from mechanistic multi-hit models.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Cooperative interaction of antimicrobial peptides with the interrelated immune pathways in plants.Molecular plant pathology · 2016Review
- Fighting Asian Soybean Rust.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complicated schemes of classical breeding and their drawbacks, environmental risks imposed by agrochemicals, decrease of arable land, and coincident escalating damages of pests and pathogens have accentuated the necessity for highly efficient measures to improve crop protection. During co-evolution of host-microbe interactions, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have exhibited a brilliant history in protecting host organisms against devastation by invading pathogens. Since the 1980s, a plethora of AMPs has been isolated from and characterized in different organisms. Nevertheless the AMPs expressed in plants render them more resistant to diverse pathogens, a more orchestrated approach based on knowledge of their mechanisms of action and cellular targets, structural toxic principle, and possible impact on immune system of corresponding transgenic plants will considerably improve crop protection strategies against harmful plant diseases. This review outlines the current knowledge on different modes of action of AMPs and then argues the waves of AMPs’ ectopic expression on transgenic plants’ immune system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.