ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011
Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Early Postoperative Mobilization on Functional Recovery, Hospital Length of Stay, and Postoperative Complications After Immediate Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator Flap Reconstruction for Irradiated Abdominoperineal Resection Defects: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Costs associated with anastomotic leak after left-sided colorectal surgery: retrospective real-world study in England.BJS open · 2026Article
- The incidence of unplanned reoperation and the related risk factors in pediatric surgery at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
- Have changes in colorectal surgery training impacted on mortality in cancer patients? A retrospective cohort study of 51,562 procedures.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025Article
- Establishing and clinically validating a machine learning model for predicting unplanned reoperation risk in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Surgeries at the Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- What is the impact of hospital and surgeon volumes on outcomes in rectal cancer surgery?Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2023Article
- Predicting major complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open hysterectomy for benign indications.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022Article
- The Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health Outcomes Beyond the Intervention: A Methodological Review.Clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Is There a Surgeons' Effect on Patients' Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention, That Requires Further Investigation? A Systematic Review.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2022Review
- Regional Variation in Unmet Need for Metabolic Surgery in England: a Retrospective, Multicohort Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Observational
- Assessment of the Clinical Usefulness of Preoperative Computed Tomography in Colorectal Cancer Patients Who Received Unplanned Reoperation.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Article
- Variation in laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery across England: a 5-year review.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Establishing Key Performance Indicators [KPIs] and Their Importance for the Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Results From a Pan-European, Delphi Consensus Study.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2017Article
- A Population-Based Cohort Study of Emergency Appendectomy Performed in England and New York State.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
- Heuristics and bias in rectal surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Article
- Addressing unwarranted variations in colorectal cancer outcomes: a conceptual approach.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe national reoperation rates after elective and emergency colorectal resection and to assess the feasibility of using reoperation as a quality indicator derived from routinely collected data in England.
designRetrospective observational study of Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data.
settingHES dataset, an administrative dataset covering the entire English National Health Service.
participantsAll patients undergoing a primary colorectal resection in England between 2000 and 2008.
main outcome measuresReoperation after colorectal resection, defined as any reoperation for an intra-abdominal procedure or wound complication within 28 days of surgery on the index or subsequent admission to hospital.
resultsThe national reoperation rate was 6.5% (15,986/246,469). A large degree of variation was identified among institutions and surgeons. Even among institutions and surgical teams with high caseloads, threefold and fivefold differences in reoperation rates were observed between the highest and lowest performing trusts and surgeons. Of the NHS trusts studied, 14.1% (22/156) had adjusted reoperation rates above the upper 99.8% control limit. Factors independently associated with higher risk of reoperation were diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (odds ratio 1.33 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.42), P<0.001), presence of multiple comorbidity (odds ratio 1.34 (1.29 to 1.39), P<0.001), social deprivation (1.14 (1.08 to 1.20) for most deprived, P<0.001), male sex (1.33 (1.29 to 1.38), P<0.001), rectal resection (1.63 (1.56 to 1.71), P<0.001), laparoscopic surgery (1.11 (1.03 to 1.20), P = 0.006), and emergency admission (1.21 (1.17 to 1.26), P<0.001).
conclusionsThere is large variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery between hospitals and surgeons in England. If data accuracy can be assured, reoperation may allow performance to be checked against national standards from current routinely collected data, alongside other indicators such as mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.