Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21845090›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2011

Epigenetic therapy for breast cancer.

Feng-Feng Cai, Corina Kohler, Bei Zhang, Ming-Hong Wang, Wei-Jie Chen, Xiao-Yan Zhong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Pyrosequencing analysis of BRCA1 methylation level in breast cancer cells.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Feng-Feng CaiLaboratory for Gynecological Oncology, Department of Biomedicine, Women's Hospital, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, Room 420, Basel, CH 4031, Switzerland; E-Mails: fcai@uhbs.ch (F.-F.C.); kohlerc@uhbs.ch (C.K.); zhangb@uhbs.ch (B.Z.); wchen@uhbs.ch (W.-J.C.).
Corina Kohler
Bei Zhang
Ming-Hong Wang
Wei-Jie Chen
Xiao-Yan Zhong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both genetic and epigenetic alterations can control the progression of cancer. Genetic alterations are impossible to reverse, while epigenetic alterations are reversible. This advantage suggests that epigenetic modifications should be preferred in therapy applications. DNA methyltransferases and histone deacetylases have become the primary targets for studies in epigenetic therapy. Some DNA methylation inhibitors and histone deacetylation inhibitors are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as anti-cancer drugs. Therefore, the uses of epigenetic targets are believed to have great potential as a lasting favorable approach in treating breast cancer.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA MethylationFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesHistone Deacetylase Inhibitorsbreast cancerDNA methylation inhibitorsepigenetic therapyHistone deacetylation inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21845090
PMCPMC3155363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.