Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21845001›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pharmacology2011

Comparison of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure, blood sugar, and lipid profile in patients of essential hypertension.

V A Badar, Sachin K Hiware, Meena P Shrivastava, V R Thawani, M M Hardas

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03847350 (An Observational Study to Identify BEnefits After 24 Weeks of NEBILET®), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03847350 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

An Observational Study to Identify BEnefits After 24 Weeks of NEBILET®(Nebivolol) Administration For Essential hypertensIon Patients With Various Co-morbidities and Treatment Environments in KOREA.

TypeobservationalSponsorA.Menarini Asia-Pacific Holdings Pte LtdRan2015 to 2017Enrolled3,250ConditionsEssential Hypertension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

V A BadarDepartment of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, India.
Sachin K Hiware
Meena P Shrivastava
V R Thawani
M M Hardas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNebivolol is a third-generation β-blocker, with highest β(1) selectivity and nitric-oxide-derived vasodilatation. It also exhibits antiproliferative and antioxidant property that has beneficial metabolic profile compared to second-generation β blockers like atenolol. This study was planned to study the comparative effects of nebivolol and atenolol on metabolic parameters in patients with essential hypertension. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective, randomized, parallel, open-label clinical study was carried out on patients with essential hypertension. The patients were randomly assigned to receive tablet atenolol (Group A) and nebivolol (Group B) for a period of 24 weeks. Investigations were carried out at baseline and at the end of study period, that is, 24 weeks. Out of 69 patients, 60 completed the study and the data was analyzed using student's t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsAtenolol and nebivolol both showed significant (P < 0.001) antihypertensive action after 24 weeks. Mean blood sugar and lipid profile were found to be significantly (P < 0.001) elevated after 24 weeks of treatment with atenolol but not with nebivolol. Heart rate was significantly (P < 0.001) decreased in both groups at 24 weeks.

conclusionIn view of metabolic adverse effects of atenolol, nebivolol is the better choice whenever β-blockers have to be used in essential hypertension.

Indexed as

Atenololblood sugarlipid profilenebivolol

Identifiers

PMID21845001
PMCPMC3153709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.