Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21844918›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2011

The road to biological pacing.

Michael R Rosen, Richard B Robinson, Peter R Brink, Ira S Cohen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cardiac and neuronal HCN channelopathies.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. A study of the outward background current conductance gPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A Brief History of Pacemaking.Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Tbx18 sets the pace.The Journal of physiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Kir2 inward rectification-controlled precise and dynamic balances between Kir2 and HCN currents initiate pacemaking activity.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael R RosenDepartment of Pharmacology, Center for Molecular Therapeutics, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, PH7 West-321, New York, NY 10032, USA. mrr1@columbia.edu
Richard B Robinson
Peter R Brink
Ira S Cohen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of biological pacing is entering its second decade of active investigation. The inception of this area of study was serendipitous, deriving largely from observations made by several teams of investigators, whose common interest was to understand the mechanisms governing cardiac impulse initiation. Research directions taken have fallen under the broad headings of gene therapy and cell therapy, and biomaterials research has also begun to enter the field. In this Review, we revisit certain milestones achieved through the construction of a 'roadmap' in biological pacing. Whether the end result will be a clinically applicable biological pacemaker is still uncertain. However, promising constructs that achieve physiologically relevant heart rates and good autonomic responsiveness are now available, and proof of principle studies are giving way to translation to large-animal models in long-term studies. Provided that interest in the field continues, the next decade should see either biological pacemakers become a clinical reality or the improvement of electronic pacemakers to a point where the biological approach is no longer a viable alternative.

Indexed as

Cardiac Pacing, ArtificialArrhythmias, CardiacBiomedical TechnologyHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.