Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21844894›Full record

ArticleCell research2012

Defining the nature of human pluripotent stem cell progeny.

Michaela Patterson, David N Chan, Iris Ha, Dana Case, Yongyan Cui, Ben Van Handel, Hanna Ka Mikkola, William E Lowry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Delayed Transplantation of Neural Stem Cells Improves Initial Graft Survival after Stroke.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Lung organoids: a new frontier in neonatology and paediatric respiratory medicine.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rag2Stem cell reports · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michaela PattersonDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
David N Chan
Iris Ha
Dana Case
Yongyan Cui
Ben Van Handel
Hanna Ka Mikkola
William E Lowry

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETIC MECHANISMS AT UCT32GM007104 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GOBER, JAMES W · 1985 to 2011
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM007104-33NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is clear that human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) can differentiate to generate a panoply of various cell types, it is unknown how closely in vitro development mirrors that which occurs in vivo. To determine whether human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) make equivalent progeny, and whether either makes cells that are analogous to tissue-derived cells, we performed comprehensive transcriptome profiling of purified PSC derivatives and their tissue-derived counterparts. Expression profiling demonstrated that hESCs and hiPSCs make nearly identical progeny for the neural, hepatic, and mesenchymal lineages, and an absence of re-expression from exogenous reprogramming factors in hiPSC progeny. However, when compared to a tissue-derived counterpart, the progeny of both hESCs and hiPSCs maintained expression of a subset of genes normally associated with early mammalian development, regardless of the type of cell generated. While pluripotent genes (OCT4, SOX2, REX1, and NANOG) appeared to be silenced immediately upon differentiation from hPSCs, genes normally unique to early embryos (LIN28A, LIN28B, DPPA4, and others) were not fully silenced in hPSC derivatives. These data and evidence from expression patterns in early human fetal tissue (3-16 weeks of development) suggest that the differentiated progeny of hPSCs are reflective of very early human development (< 6 weeks). These findings provide support for the idea that hPSCs can serve as useful in vitro models of early human development, but also raise important issues for disease modeling and the clinical application of hPSC derivatives.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineageCellular ReprogrammingCluster AnalysisEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene SilencingGerm LayersHepatocytesHumansNeural Stem CellsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pluripotent Stem CellsLin28A protein, humanOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanRNA-Binding ProteinsSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21844894
PMCPMC3351932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.